[board-discuss] Open letter for revive LOOL, add your +1 if you agree

2022-07-26 Thread Luc Novales
+1 Luc.

[board-discuss] Open letter for revive LOOL, add your +1 if you agree

2022-07-24 Thread Patrick Auclair
I Totally agree. +1 -- Lorsque tu arrives en haut de la montagne, continue de grimper. ;)

[board-discuss] Open letter for revive LOOL, add your +1 if you agree

2022-07-18 Thread Celia Palacios
+1 LOOL is so necessary in terms of competitivity. I do not have a say technical-wise. Celia Palacios celia.palac...@libreoffice.org

RE: [board-discuss] Open letter for revive LOOL, add your +1 if you agree

2022-07-13 Thread Penny Mar
Hi everyone! Penny here, on the Spanish Documentation Team we mostly like the idea of reopening that project, taking into account two things: First, we´d like to maintain the TDF spirit about keeping things public and open. And second, we agree to try it for a trial period and check if this

[board-discuss] Open letter for revive LOOL, add your +1 if you agree

2022-07-13 Thread Jose Mª Lopez
On 10.07.2022 15:42, Daniel A. Rodriguez wrote: We, the undersigned, would like to express our great concern regarding the definitive closure of the repository of what was LibreOffice Online. Considering the mission of facilitating access to information and communication technologies as a

[board-discuss] Open letter for revive LOOL, add your +1 if you agree

2022-07-11 Thread Celia Palacios
+1 It is so necessary in terms of competitively. I do not have a say technical wise.

Re: [board-discuss] Open letter for revive LOOL, add your +1 if you agree

2022-07-11 Thread Ade Malsasa Akbar
+1. I also wholeheartedly agree. Thank you. Sincerely yours, Ade -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more:

Re: [board-discuss] Open letter for revive LOOL, add your +1 if you agree

2022-07-11 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi all, Thanks for sharing your opinions, but the statement here is factual incorrect: Daniel A. Rodriguez wrote on 10/07/2022 22:42: We, the undersigned, would like to express our great concern regarding the definitive closure of the repository of what was LibreOffice Online. ... People

Re: [board-discuss] Open letter for revive LOOL, add your +1 if you agree

2022-07-11 Thread Alexander Thurgood
My ha'penneth below. Surely, the point of TDF is/was to foster community driven contributions by all ? If a languishing codebase was already there, and people are now prepared to update it and have a go at making something of it, shouldn't TDF be seen to be supporting such an initiative ?

Re: [board-discuss] Open letter for revive LOOL, add your +1 if you agree

2022-07-11 Thread Heiko Tietze
-1 LOOL is just a UI flavor to me. It's nothing without the core and provides just one way to interact with the application (admittedly some special handling which might be important for many). I understand COOL (and any other implementations) as a win-win situation for TDF. If LibreOffice

Re: [board-discuss] Open letter for revive LOOL, add your +1 if you agree

2022-07-10 Thread El Mau
On 10.07.2022 15:42, Daniel A. Rodriguez wrote: We, the undersigned, would like to express our great concern regarding the definitive closure of the repository of what was LibreOffice Online. Considering the mission of facilitating access to information and communication technologies as a

[board-discuss] Open letter for revive LOOL, add your +1 if you agree

2022-07-10 Thread Daniel A. Rodriguez
We, the undersigned, would like to express our great concern regarding the definitive closure of the repository of what was LibreOffice Online. Considering the mission of facilitating access to information and communication technologies as a fundamental and strategic achievement of inclusion