Hello everyone,
Following our confcall of Saturday, I would first like to express my
apologies for my message on the status of our community bylaws.
At the moment our community bylaws are *almost* good. Some people here
and elsewhere have expressed a strong opinion on the clause on racism
and
A few comments about the last comments:
1st: Yes, the negatives (racism, xenophobia, sexism and religious or
political intolerance) are covered by the positives, if we were driven
by common sense, but unfortunately this is not always the case, and I
feel that we should maintain the sentence
Thanks to everyone for their work!
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2010-12-06 17.20:
Well spoken. And with that, I declare the Community Bylaws adopted
(provided nobody from the SC punches me in the face right away)...
--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and
Hi
Some thoughts and questions from my personal experience:
1) I am a bit concerned of the definition of project: It looks like TDF
will foster several software projects, which is fine for me, but then
(may be I am a bit biased by OOo structure), how do we manage NLC, L10n,
Marketing and
Hi Charles, SC guys :-)
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 01:23, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
David, as usual, please feel free to review the language... thanks!
--
Charles-H. Schulz
1) Would it perhaps be useful to add a definition for the term
community under
