Hi,
Andre Schnabel wrote on 2011-03-14 15.14:
As long as we do not have the foundation in legal terms, we should be
very carefull in partnering with external parties when it comes
to storing data. German law is very strict when it comes to storing
private data (there has been some discussions
Hi,
Jaime R. Garza wrote on 2011-03-11 16.32:
Because some E-Mail servers that receive E-Mails from other E-Mails servers
that are not verified with the proper domain, will be blocked
or classified as SPAM. At least that's my experience, I have my own domain
and when I sent E-Mails from my
Hi Florian,
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 11:26 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
A Free software solution, for which they do the maintenance ?
Yep. Based on Postfix, probably amavis, ClamAV and other parts of the
LAMP stack. They're doing OSS consulting. Will ask if I may make their
offer
Le Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:26:47 +0100,
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org a écrit :
Hi,
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-03-11 14.25:
Le Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:42:45 +,
Michael Meeksmichael.me...@novell.com a écrit :
A Free software solution, for which they do the
Hi,
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-03-14 14.02:
Yes. This protocols helps to store data other than emails (for instance
it could be used to store documents, see the works from the unhosted
project). Implementing webfinger is perhaps already done (Gmail and
Yahoo implement it), it's just an
Le Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:37:06 +0100,
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org a écrit :
Hi,
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-03-14 14.02:
Yes. This protocols helps to store data other than emails (for
instance it could be used to store documents, see the works from
the unhosted
Hi,
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-03-14 14.52:
Ah, then I might have misunderstood the initial proposal
completely!:-) I thought this provider was offering us actual
mailboxes. But in any case, it's always good to ask them about the
protocol...
oh, no, right now, we've only been talking
Hi guys,
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 12:52 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Leave the mail for TDF oficials as @documetnfoundation.org
+1, I would even add the following: @libreoffice.org are only available
for official contributors and even they have to request it (I don't
exactly see the
...@novell.com
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Mon, 17 January, 2011 9:40:26
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
Hi guys,
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 12:52 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Leave the mail for TDF oficials as @documetnfoundation.org
+1, I would even
Sent: Sun, 16 January, 2011 19:53:41
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
Hi Charles, *,
Who is it, You agree?
Charles-H. Schulz schrieb:
Le Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:23:02 +0100, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de a écrit :
Olivier Hallot schrieb:
Em 14
Hello Friedrich,
2011/1/16 Friedrich Strohmaier damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de
Hi Charles, *,
Who is it, You agree?
Charles-H. Schulz schrieb:
Le Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:23:02 +0100, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de a écrit :
Olivier Hallot schrieb:
Em 14-01-2011
] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
Hello Friedrich,
2011/1/16 Friedrich Strohmaier damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de
Hi Charles, *,
Who is it, You agree?
Charles-H. Schulz schrieb:
Le Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:23:02 +0100, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de a écrit :
Olivier Hallot
:31
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
Hello Friedrich,
2011/1/16 Friedrich Strohmaier damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de
Hi Charles, *,
Who is it, You agree?
Charles-H. Schulz schrieb:
Le Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:23:02 +0100, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4
the results might help us get good results.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Mon, 17 January, 2011 11:04:00
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
Hi,
2011/1/16 Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org:
+1, I would even add the following: @libreoffice.org are only available
for official contributors and even they have to request it (I don't
exactly see the automatic need for, say, a code contributor to have
such an
Hi, :-)
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 20:53, Volker Merschmann merschm...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't you think that the rule that active contributing is mandatory
for membership does apply? Else there will be members of different
degrees. :-(
+1
David Nelson
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Le Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:53:47 +0100,
Volker Merschmann merschm...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi,
2011/1/16 Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org:
+1, I would even add the following: @libreoffice.org are only
available for official contributors and even they have to request
If you guys would like i have experience setting up email servers on Linux.
it would be an imaps dovecot server + postfix.
the way it will work is in order to have an email you have to have an
account on the server. also there will be web mail access, as well as
access via clients like
Hi Charles, *,
Who is it, You agree?
Charles-H. Schulz schrieb:
Le Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:23:02 +0100, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de a écrit :
Olivier Hallot schrieb:
Em 14-01-2011 16:16, Tom Davies escreveu:
OTOH if people use the email address per...@openoffice.org
Hi,
Am 14.01.2011 09:11, schrieb Florian Effenberger:
However, as we had lots of irritating issues with @openoffice.org
e-mail addresses, I would like to avoid these mistakes.
Well, the real problem at OOo with such adresses was, that anybody could
register at the website and then could use
Flo,
On 14/01/2011 11:11, Florian Effenberger wrote:
[...]
What are your thoughts?
I've forwarded your mail to the l10n list to get the feedback of the
team. So the link to the archive of the thread is:
http://go.mail-archive.com/LdL2QlAJepqW7wxcToMVwNaZbWE=
Kind regards
Sophie
--
Hi Olivier, *,
Olivier Hallot schrieb:
Em 14-01-2011 16:16, Tom Davies escreveu:
OTOH if people use the email address per...@openoffice.org then it
gets the name OpenOffice out there and being seen by a lot of
people. Free advertising!
+1
For some people this is even a matter of pride,
Hi, :-)
Small idea: have you considered using Google Apps for the project's
mail needs? *So* easy to set-up, *so* easy to maintain,
feature-packed, and I'm sure they will give TDF a free upgrade to an
enterprise account. Lots of other benefits, too.
David Nelson
--
Unsubscribe instructions:
Hi,
Michael Meeks wrote on 2011-01-14 09.50:
In general, IMHO etc. I believe a forwarding setup, as well as being
easier fits into most people's existing mail flows rather better. Also
using a proprietary software hosted service for our project would not be
an ideal choice IMHO;-)
I
Hi *,
I'll only give short feedback on the suggested names
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
My plan is actually to have something like
volunteer.nickn...@libreofficecommunity.org
+1 (long, but fits)
or
Hi, :-)
If it's not a real libreoffice.org or documentfoundation.org
account, I don't think anyone will be interested. I know I
wouldn't bother using one of these libreofficecommunity.org, etc.,
accounts myself i'd just use my own mail account in that case
0.2 cents. ;-)
David
Hi,
Am 14.01.2011 17:34, schrieb Christian Lohmaier:
volunteer.nickn...@libreofficecommunity.org
volunteer.nickn...@libreofficemail.org
volunteer.nickn...@libreofficevolunteers.org
-1 (I just prefer the community one - with volunteer there is a
(slight) distinction
Hi,
On 14/01/2011 20:33, Volker Merschmann wrote:
[...]
For the rest: I do not like any of the offered domain names, they all
are too long. I would like to see nickn...@libreoffice.org for the
members.
Agreed with Volker here, wouldn't be possible to have it as simple as
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 20:53 +0300, sophie wrote:
Hi,
On 14/01/2011 20:33, Volker Merschmann wrote:
[...]
For the rest: I do not like any of the offered domain names, they all
are too long. I would like to see nickn...@libreoffice.org for the
members.
Agreed with Volker here, wouldn't
Hi Florian, all
Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
as discussed yesterday in the confcall, we're planning to give out
official LibreOffice e-mail accounts to people who are community members
per the membership committee's decision. [...]
My plan is to hand out only e-mail forwarders,
January, 2011 19:21:10
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
Em 14-01-2011 16:16, Tom Davies escreveu:
OTOH if people use the email address per...@openoffice.org then it gets the
name OpenOffice out there and being seen by a lot of people. Free
advertising!
+1
For some
On 1/14/11 8:21 PM, Olivier Hallot wrote:
So, nickn...@libreoffice.org
Leave the mail for TDF oficials as @documetnfoundation.org
I totally agree with Olivier. Just to make the concept stronger, and to
protect us from possible email trolls, we can add a specific paragraph
in the bylaws.
Hi all!
Am Freitag, den 14.01.2011, 23:47 +0100 schrieb Christoph Noack:
And if there are still some concerns, my proposal would be:
forename.lastn...@community.libreoffice.org
Sorry for this proposal, I totally missed Florian's earlier mail
containing a statement concerning sub-domains. Bad
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 23:47 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote:
Hi all!
Am Freitag, den 14.01.2011, 20:45 +0100 schrieb Italo Vignoli:
On 1/14/11 8:21 PM, Olivier Hallot wrote:
So, nickn...@libreoffice.org
Leave the mail for TDF oficials as @documetnfoundation.org
I totally agree
34 matches
Mail list logo
