Hi guys,
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 12:52 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Leave the mail for TDF oficials as @documetnfoundation.org
+1, I would even add the following: @libreoffice.org are only available
for official contributors and even they have to request it (I don't
exactly see the
Hi guys ...
ladies [ bows ]
I think that giving @LibreOffice.Org email addresses out to even non-members
would be a good way of getting the name Libre Office out there and visible.
People don't assume that Yahoo is represented by people with an @Yahoo.Co.Uk
address so could we do
Hi again :)
Clearly a lot of people agree with me about giving the email addresses out to
even non-members would do us a lot of good.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Friedrich Strohmaier damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Hello Friedrich,
2011/1/16 Friedrich Strohmaier damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de
Hi Charles, *,
Who is it, You agree?
Charles-H. Schulz schrieb:
Le Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:23:02 +0100, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de a écrit :
Olivier Hallot schrieb:
Em 14-01-2011
Yes, obviously we can't force people to use any email address!
For me the question is how to be attractive enough that people do want to
choose
to use it. Often just making something exclusive makes people want it more,
especially if there is a known kudos behind it.
One thing that worries
Hello Tom,
2011/1/17 Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
Yes, obviously we can't force people to use any email address!
For me the question is how to be attractive enough that people do want to
choose
to use it. Often just making something exclusive makes people want it
more,
especially
Hi,
Von: Sophie Gautier
I begin to think about the tooling needed for the membership process.
Are we going to use RT [1] for handling requests and follow up? Gnome is
using it for his membership as well.
Or have you already anything else in mind?
Well .. I did not think about special
Ahh, excellent. A useful link there :) Looks like good work too :)
Wolvix also doesn't hand out email addresses to people but Ubuntu does. Yahoo
became quite well know despite doing little else except handing out email
addresses and grew from there.
Refusing to use 1 particular way of
Hi André, Fridrich,
On 17/01/2011 14:05, Andre Schnabel wrote:
Hi,
Von: Sophie Gautier
I begin to think about the tooling needed for the membership process.
Are we going to use RT [1] for handling requests and follow up? Gnome is
using it for his membership as well.
Or have you already
Hi,
Andre Schnabel wrote on 2011-01-17 13.17:
the times in the poll look somehow strange. E.g. Wednesday up to 17:00 only,
Thursday up to 16:00, other days to 19:00. this will drop Wednesday and Thursday
completely for me (and I'd guess our brazilian friends are also not very
happy to get up
Hello,
I received a request to connect an external Alfresco site to one of our
domain names. Apart from the concern that the workflow hadn't been
defined (why now Alfresco?), I'm a bit sceptical to connecting external
servers to our domain name, because they are associated with us and thus
I second your concerns on this. Are there guidelines set down in regards
to self hosted servers?
On 01/17/2011 02:37 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
I received a request to connect an external Alfresco site to one of
our domain names. Apart from the concern that the workflow hadn't
I am all for OSS, i'm starting my business with nothing but open source
software. I think in my case as well as for the document foundation, the
concerns are how secure are the services provided by 3rd parties.
On 01/17/2011 06:47 PM, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
Sorry, I'm not part of the Steering
I think we should split the current LibreOffice channel. The current one
will be used for user support, and a new channel LO-dev or something of
that sort would be for strict development work only. What do you guys
think?
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Le Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:52:54 +0100,
Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com a écrit :
I think we should split the current LibreOffice channel. The current
one will be used for user support, and a new channel LO-dev or
something of that sort would be for strict development work only.
What do
is that the dev channel for LO? or that a general document foundation
channel for the Lo project and any other projects that fall under the
document foundation ?
On 01/17/2011 07:11 PM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Le Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:52:54 +0100,
Jonathan Aquilinaeagles051...@gmail.com a
Le Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:02:37 +0100,
Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com a écrit :
is that the dev channel for LO? or that a general document foundation
channel for the Lo project and any other projects that fall under the
document foundation ?
On 01/17/2011 07:11 PM, Charles-H.
I think its best guide lines for 3rd party servers and mirrors. Once
things are well established I think it would be hard to change the
guidelines for those 3rd parties that were established prior to the
guidelines existing.
On 01/17/2011 07:01 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
There are no real
I'm all for security and stability, but I would expect that OSS is prefered
over Proprietary services like Google Apps.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 19:03, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hi,
as soon as some service is hosted at the LibO or TDF domain or is otherwise
Hi, :-)
The situation is that the workflow can already be considered to be 80%
or 90% complete, and the next step will be some pilot testing with
actual work on documentation content, which could start later this
week.
In parallel, I'd also been planning to throw open an invite to i18n
people
What do you mean by My server has excellent 24/7 technical support.? Is
your server @ Amazon or other amazon like Company?
For a Document Management System DMS, I will definitely suggest to use
Alfresco in a secure place which guarantees 24/7 up time and support, but
definitely not a home server.
21 matches
Mail list logo
