On Sat, 2011-08-06 at 18:43 +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Caolan,
I think we got that covered already in the text... Or am I wrong?
I thought it was such that the default logos (with TDF on it) could be
used under the substantially unchanged concept. But on re-reading, it
reads more like
Hi,
Von: Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org
Hmm, if that confuses you, it will confuse otgers.
I htink, what is confusing here is that ...
Le 8 août 2011 11:50, Caolan McNamara cao...@skynet.ie a écrit :
I'm not super-attached to the TDF tagline for
Hi Peter,
On 2011-07-20 at 16:26 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
my name is Peter Kubek and I am from Slovak republic.
I am owner domain www.libreoffice.sk
Can I work on slovak site? sk.libreoffice.org?
So I think the best would be to contact the Slovak mailing lists
directly:
Hi :)
I think that unnecessarily exposing TDF (or people doing work for it) to a risk
in a way that could NOT be fix easily quickly would be really dumb. It is an
easily avoidable risk.
The fact that one person is ignorant of the risk (or chooses to ignore it) does
not mean the rest of
Hi Tom,
Am 08.08.2011 15:43, schrieb Tom Davies:
The fact that one person is ignorant of the risk (or chooses to ignore it) does
not mean the rest of the Steering Committee are. Indeed, there was a meeting
that came up with the rough draft of the 2 paragraphs prepared by Florian.
There is
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Hi :)
I think that unnecessarily exposing TDF (or people doing work for it) to a
risk
in a way that could NOT be fix easily quickly would be really dumb. It is
an
easily avoidable risk.
I think it is unnecessary
Hi :)
It's easy to make empty promises but there is nothing written down to say that
the Steering Committee and BoD would accept any responsibility at all. The
risk
is all on individual contributors at the moment.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: André Schnabel
Hi :)
There were a reasonable amount of +1s to the first draft produced by Florian
and no-one voted against it then or after the meeting. We had just heard the
advice of a couple of legal people one of whom specialises in this type of
area.
Regards from
Tom :)
:-)
What is the precise issue you have with the proposed amended language, Tom?
Please be specific so we aren't just appealing to the gallery here. I assert
that the language I am proposing is a minor change that has the same effect as
the earlier text but ensures we do not leave hostages to
Hi :)
The precise problem i have with the amended wording is that it reverses the
meaning of the 2 paragraphs. Florian did a minor adjustment but your's
completely changes it to say the opposite of the original.
I suspect that no-one on the SC or BoD has any legal training or experience in
10 matches
Mail list logo
