[board-discuss] Apache ODF Toolkit migration

2018-11-28 Thread Michael Stahl
hello TDF folks, hello ODF Toolkit community, i'm writing here as a Committer (fwiw) of the Apache ODF Toolkit (incubating) project. it turns out the ASF has voted to rename the Apache ODF Toolkit (incubating) project to Apache ODF Toolkit (retired).

Re: [board-discuss] Apache ODF Toolkit migration

2018-11-30 Thread Michael Stahl
hi Dennis, On 28.11.18 12:49, Dennis Roczek wrote: On 28.11.2018 11:00, Michael Meeks wrote: 2. the web site, in SVN (will also be changed to read-only): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/site/ the SVN repo contains some MarkDown files that are converted to ...

Re: [board-discuss] Apache ODF Toolkit migration

2018-11-30 Thread Michael Stahl
wrote: Michael Meeks wrote: > On 28/11/2018 09:40, Michael Stahl wrote: > > so i'll propose to migrate the ODF Toolkit to The Document Foundation. > >       Seems like something the BoD should vote on, In general, subject to the > marke

Re: [board-discuss] How is TDC compelled to keep the user first?

2020-02-28 Thread Michael Stahl
On 28.02.20 15:04, Brett Cornwall wrote: Other Free Software projects have had for-profit entities created underneath the stewardship of a non-profit; Mozilla Corporation and Canonical are two living examples. Sacrifices to user empowerment are off-topic, but: how is Canonical related to

Re: [board-discuss] Discussion about options available with marketing plan draft and timetable

2020-07-09 Thread Michael Stahl
On 09.07.20 18:19, Andreas Mantke wrote: and there are three reasons, why TDF is "Gemeinnützig": * der Volks- und Berufsbildung, * der Wissenschaft und Forschung, insbesondere auf dem Gebiet der Informatik, * des bürgerschaftlichen Engagements zugunsten gemeinnütziger Zwecke.

Re: [board-discuss] TDF Budget 2021

2021-03-25 Thread Michael Stahl
On 25.03.21 09:52, Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote: On 25.3.2021 8.58, Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote: On 24.3.2021 20.46, Andreas Mantke wrote: Thus TDF has to evaluate the reasons for this poor execution and make improvements (especially for the time after the corona pandemic). If TDF will dodge on this

Re: [board-discuss] Drafting Tender "Cleanup & further improve ODF conformance"

2021-10-29 Thread Michael Stahl
On 29.10.21 14:57, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi Florian, (1) The link http://autotests.opendocumentformat.org from item "Required 1." does not work. Do you have another reference for ODFAutoTests? the git repo is here: https://gitlab.com/odfplugfest/odfautotests but it does look quite

Re: [board-discuss] Drafting Tender "Cleanup & further improve ODF conformance"

2021-11-03 Thread Michael Stahl
On 29.10.21 08:32, Florian Effenberger wrote: Hello, one of the approved [1] tenders is the Tender "Cleanup & further improve ODF conformance" The board would like to work together in public with all of you on this tender before it gets officially published. The current draft is

Re: [board-discuss] Draft text: an "attic" proposal - version 2.0

2022-03-14 Thread Michael Stahl
hi Andreas, On 14.03.22 18:36, Andreas Mantke wrote: and with the proposal the Android Viewer had to be put the attic and wouldn't currently get the chance to get out of this state (because only one developer looking for it). that's a bad example: the Android Viewer is in the core.git

[board-discuss] Re: Draft document for TDF in-house developers proposal

2022-02-25 Thread Michael Stahl
On 25.02.22 15:43, Paolo Vecchi wrote: Hi Michael, thanks for your feedback. On 25/02/2022 10:22, Michael Meeks wrote: > In the graph above the committers have been grouped in Commercial > (companies specialised in selling LibreOffice development and > products), Corporate (companies and

Re: [board-discuss] Drafting Tender "Cleanup & further improve ODF conformance"

2022-02-04 Thread Michael Stahl
might still be more than the budget which the BoD wants to spend, so i guess a fixed budget and then apply for a subset of the issues makes sense. Michael Stahl wrote on 03.11.21 at 10:49: the scope of this is quite large and unclear... *required* items are: 1. ODFAutoTests: addressing issu

Re: [board-discuss] Drafting Tender "Cleanup & further improve ODF conformance"

2022-02-04 Thread Michael Stahl
hello again, On 03.02.22 14:30, Florian Effenberger wrote: Florian Effenberger wrote on 01.12.21 at 15:30: (3) Is it possible to get https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48392 ODF: Implementation for svg:linearGradient and svg:radialGradient is missing as explicit issue for

Re: Please take personal conflict off-list (was: [board-discuss] Merged proposal for in-house developers at TDF)

2022-06-02 Thread Michael Stahl
hello Paolo, On 02.06.22 19:55, Paolo Vecchi wrote: > > Also thanks to Andreas comment about the ESC minutes I had a look at > last week and today's minutes and it seems like Michael Meeks is already > implementing his proposal, transposed mostly by copy/paste by Kendy in > his own proposal

Re: [board-discuss] Agenda for TDF board meeting on Monday, October 31st at 1800 Berlin time (UTC+1)

2022-10-31 Thread Michael Stahl
hi Andreas, On 29.10.22 22:07, Andreas Mantke wrote: In additon: I reviewed the whole process about sending a project to the attic again. The proposal for the process seemed to neutral text, but it was only written and voted on for one subproject: LOOL. The only four members, which participated

Re: [DISCUSS] Re: [board-discuss] [VOTE] New proposal for hiring in-house developers.

2022-12-02 Thread Michael Stahl
hi Jean-Baptiste, On 02.12.22 19:21, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: Hi Thorsten, If the ESC is an official TDF committee, where are its statutes, its functioning rules and the rules of its members designation ? hmm i've wondered this too a while ago, i couldn't find a word in the TDF statutes

[DISCUSS] Re: [board-discuss] [VOTE] New proposal for hiring in-house developers.

2022-12-02 Thread Michael Stahl
hi Stephan, On 02.12.22 11:12, Stephan Ficht wrote: Dear board, hi all, = Foreword: I here speak in my capacity as a Member of the Board of Trustees. = This part of the vote TDF will seek to hire a developer(s); - who will report [...], and consult weekly with the ESC, which will oversee