On 25/03/2021 13:43, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
No idea how much it evaluation it received from the then BoD, but FWIW
that project was mentioned in passing on this very list 4 years ago
during the discussion that got /foundation/code-of-conduct published and
adopted:
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 23:34:50 +0100, Emiliano Vavassori wrote:
> Il 23/03/21 23:27, William Gathoye (LibreOffice) ha scritto:
>> I know you have been working on this (cf. occurrences in "Board of
>> Directors Meeting 2021-03-12" and even back from the days Marina was at
>> the board), I'm
Dear community,
we are aware of the recent developments around FSF and Richard
Stallman's role in their board, and do take your concerns very
seriously, as we do share them.
TDF is currently preparing an official statement and discusses further
steps. We will send out official communication
On 24.03.2021 00:59, Simon Phipps wrote:
Instead, I am asking the Board to suspend FSF's membership of TDF's
Advisory Board until such time as they regain the authority that led
to them being freely offered the role in the first place and which
they have squandered by their recent actions. I
Hi Michael, Simon,
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:59:27PM +, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:16 PM Michael Meeks
> wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps more measured than:
Which shows that there are some measured and uncontroversial things that
_need_ to be said in this situation
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:16 PM Michael Meeks
wrote:
>
> On 23/03/2021 18:56, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> > Am 23.03.21 um 19:11 schrieb Italo Vignoli:
> >> OSI statement: https://opensource.org/OSI_Response
> >
> > great and consequent statement.
>
> Perhaps more measured than:
>
>
On 23/03/2021 18:56, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> Am 23.03.21 um 19:11 schrieb Italo Vignoli:
>> OSI statement: https://opensource.org/OSI_Response
>
> great and consequent statement.
Perhaps more measured than:
https://rms-open-letter.github.io/
Which is gathering steam,
On 2021-03-23 17:46, Simon Phipps wrote:
I'll be more direct than Andreas in this matter. Given the FSF Board has
demonstrated[1] that it is aware that reappointing RMS would be regarded as
bad judgement by everyone at LibrePlanet, and given other organisations[2]
are choosing to disconnect FSF
Il 23/03/21 23:27, William Gathoye (LibreOffice) ha scritto:
Also, this RMS situation is the perfect timing to have/enforce a proper
contributor agreement/code of conduct/manifesto/call-it-what-you-want-to
agreement without the need to reinvent the wheel.
Which is already in place since some
On 23/03/2021 22:18, Marina Latini wrote:
Agree, what happened is unbelievable and TDF should take distance.
Also, this RMS situation is the perfect timing to have/enforce a proper
contributor agreement/code of conduct/manifesto/call-it-what-you-want-to
agreement without the need to
On 23/03/2021 22:18, Marina Latini wrote:
Agree, what happened is unbelievable and TDF should take distance.
+1 and I would even answer, that I would personally take distance from
TDF if TDF dodges an answer on that topic (and we should all too).
Silence gives consent, right?
Views
On 23.03.2021 18:46, Simon Phipps wrote:
Hi Simon, all,
I'll be more direct than Andreas in this matter. Given the FSF Board
has demonstrated[1] that it is aware that reappointing RMS would be
regarded as bad judgement by everyone at LibrePlanet, and given other
organisations[2] are choosing
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 05:46:18PM +, Simon Phipps wrote:
> I'll be more direct than Andreas in this matter. Given the FSF Board has
> demonstrated[1] that it is aware that reappointing RMS would be regarded as
> bad judgement by everyone at LibrePlanet, and given other organisations[2]
>
Am 23.03.21 um 19:11 schrieb Italo Vignoli:
> OSI statement: https://opensource.org/OSI_Response
>
great and consequent statement.
Regards,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems?
OSI statement: https://opensource.org/OSI_Response
On 3/23/21 6:46 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
I'll be more direct than Andreas in this matter. Given the FSF Board has
demonstrated[1] that it is aware that reappointing RMS would be regarded
as bad judgement by everyone at LibrePlanet, and given
I'll be more direct than Andreas in this matter. Given the FSF Board has
demonstrated[1] that it is aware that reappointing RMS would be regarded as
bad judgement by everyone at LibrePlanet, and given other organisations[2]
are choosing to disconnect FSF from their governance, TDF's Board should
Hi Michael, all,
Am 23.03.21 um 12:11 schrieb Michael Meeks:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On 23/03/2021 10:07, Andreas Mantke wrote:
>> What's the position of TDF board on this topic ?
> As you know this sort of question is a very easy one to ask but as with
> anything where there are a wide diversity
Hi Andreas,
On 23/03/2021 10:07, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> What's the position of TDF board on this topic ?
As you know this sort of question is a very easy one to ask but as with
anything where there are a wide diversity of opinions - tends to be an
extraordinarily expensive one to answer
Hi,
I read about the change in the board of the FSF, a member of the TDF
Advisory Board:
https://www.zdnet.com/article/richard-m-stallman-returns-to-the-free-software-foundation-board-of-directors/
There are a lot of contributors in the Free Software business, which are
seeing this change toxic
19 matches
Mail list logo
