Terje Slettebø wrote:
/home/boost/boost-regress/boost/boost/lexical_cast.hpp:173: syntax error
before `;'
Looking at the CVS, it appears the reason for this is that
config/compiler/gcc.hpp no longer defines BOOST_NO_STRINGSTREAM, even
though it should, at least for 2.95.x and below, as is
From: Vladimir Prus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Terje Slettebø wrote:
/home/boost/boost-regress/boost/boost/lexical_cast.hpp:173: syntax
error
before `;'
Looking at the CVS, it appears the reason for this is that
config/compiler/gcc.hpp no longer defines BOOST_NO_STRINGSTREAM, even
though
jeff ha escrito:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:07:54 -0600, David B. Held wrote
I'd say 6 or 7 people expressing interest is more than enough to justify
Boostifying the code at this stage.
I agree. Since you have written an article which clearly describes
the concept and provides an example
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:47:57 -0600, David B. Held
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gennaro Prota [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
I don't know if it's useful or not but it's certainly usable. The fact
that deduction fails in your case doesn't mean it fails always; and
At 01:38 AM 3/17/2003, Victor A. Wagner, Jr. wrote:
I finally got simple_ls to compile and link.
The build now correctly builds two libraries (one release, one debug) and
if you point to the right place (shouldn't there be some way to marshall
the libraries instead of leaving them scattered
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 09:35:11 +0100, Terje Slettebø
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Vladimir Prus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't have much to say, but lexical_cast was broken just now. My code
which
was compiling a week ago and wasn't changed since now produces the same
warning, after updating to
At 10:40 PM 3/16/2003, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Could this patch be accepted in time for 1.30.0? I asked yesterday for a
fix to array.hpp that allows it to be used when exceptions are disabled,
and this looks legit to me.
The change looks innocuous to me. Would anyone object if I go ahead an
apply
Gennaro Prota wrote:
Ok. I've forwarded this to Kevlin.
Maybe there's more than one problem here. I see that Vladimir talks
about warnings while Jeff about errors. Also maybe it helps to see the
exact condition to define BOOST_NO_STRINGSTREAM in
config/stdlib/sgi.hpp, with the comment
* [Boost.Regex] [PATCH] Fix GCC 3.3 warnings from Lars Gullik Bjønnes.
Awaiting response from John Maddock.
(Since this one just eliminates warnings, the release won't be held
for it.)
That one will have to wait - gcc 3.3 hasn't been released yet anyway.
* [type_traits] is_class.hpp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Beman,
the library name is still fs. I was under the impression that this was
only temporary and should be changed to a more boost compatible
boost_filesystem before release. From a pratical point of view fs
seems like begging for a nameclash.
Thomas
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:47:20 +0300, Vladimir Prus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Gennaro Prota wrote:
Ok. I've forwarded this to Kevlin.
Maybe there's more than one problem here. I see that Vladimir talks
about warnings while Jeff about errors. Also maybe it helps to see the
exact condition to
John Maddock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| * [Boost.Regex] [PATCH] Fix GCC 3.3 warnings from Lars Gullik Bjønnes.
| Awaiting response from John Maddock.
| (Since this one just eliminates warnings, the release won't be held
| for it.)
|
| That one will have to wait - gcc 3.3 hasn't been
Andreas Huber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Beman John,
Both the main trunk and RC_1_30_0 are working fine for me as of Sunday 6PM
US Eastern time.
Douglas Gregor has already fixed the is_class.hpp problem, please see
http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg45230.php
Today's Win32
OK, so how I ask for preliminary review? Posting a mail here?
Yes, you can just ask for preliminary feedback on this list.
Another thing you can do is put the code in the boost-sandbox.
This helps get things into the boost structure and allows other
boosters to keep up with changes as the
Gennaro Prota [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
What monster are you creating, man? :-)
I must be the only one here that actually writes application code,
because it never ceases to amaze me how everyone else can follow
all these neat and tidy rules for writing
At 07:14 AM 3/17/2003, John Maddock wrote:
* [Boost.Regex] [PATCH] Fix GCC 3.3 warnings from Lars Gullik Bjønnes.
Awaiting response from John Maddock.
(Since this one just eliminates warnings, the release won't be held
for it.)
That one will have to wait - gcc 3.3 hasn't been
At 08:16 AM 3/17/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Still looks broken over here:
http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/results/1047901021/dailylog_win32_vc60
We are still waiting for SourceForge to clear an errant lock. It can't be
fixed until then.
--Beman
___
Terje Slettebø wrote:
typedef std::vectorchar vector_char;
vector_char values;
// Fill with 'A', 'B', 'C'
std::cout io::formatvector_char([, ], , , \', \') values;
Output:
['A', 'B', 'C']
However, is this overkill?
It seems that way, especially considering that if it was
At 07:17 AM 3/17/2003, Thomas Witt wrote:
the library name is still fs. I was under the impression that this was
only temporary and should be changed to a more boost compatible
boost_filesystem before release. From a pratical point of view fs
seems like begging for a nameclash.
Good point.
OK,
David Abrahams wrote:
Andreas Huber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Still looks broken over here:
http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/results/1047901021/dailylog_win32_vc60
I think it's OK to revert the patch to get 1.30.0 out, but for the
future, I think we should keep in mind that it's actually is_function
Jeff Garland ha escrito:
OK, so how I ask for preliminary review? Posting a mail here?
Yes, you can just ask for preliminary feedback on this list.
Another thing you can do is put the code in the boost-sandbox.
This helps get things into the boost structure and allows other
boosters to
From: Gennaro Prota [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:47:20 +0300, Vladimir Prus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Gennaro Prota wrote:
Ok. I've forwarded this to Kevlin.
Maybe there's more than one problem here. I see that Vladimir talks
about warnings while Jeff about errors. Also
At 12:27 PM 3/17/2003, Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:
Jeff Garland ha escrito:
OK, so how I ask for preliminary review? Posting a mail here?
Yes, you can just ask for preliminary feedback on this list.
Another thing you can do is put the code in the boost-sandbox.
This helps get things
At 03:40 PM 3/17/2003, Terje Slettebø wrote:
Well, I think this reinforces the suggestion to define
BOOST_NO_STRINGSTREAM
for 2.95.x. Comments?
Either that, or to have some way to detect where
std::basic_stringstream
is not supported, and turn off wide character support for that, in
Daniel Frey wrote:
Still looks broken over here:
http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/results/1047901021/dailylog_win32_vc60
I think it's OK to revert the patch to get 1.30.0 out,
Which patch? John said the changes that caused the disturbance were
never intended to be checked in.
but for the
From: Jason House [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Terje Slettebø wrote:
typedef std::vectorchar vector_char;
vector_char values;
// Fill with 'A', 'B', 'C'
std::cout io::formatvector_char([, ], , , \', \')
values;
Output:
['A', 'B', 'C']
However, is this overkill?
It seems that
Hi all,
I just compiled the regex library under C++Builder 5.
I've tried to compile an application and it complains about not being able
to find STLPMT.LIB - I can find no information on this LIB.
Help ?
Malcolm Smith
Analyst Programmer
Comvision Pty Ltd
http://www.comvision.org
At 06:51 PM 3/17/2003, Malcolm Smith wrote:
I just compiled the regex library under C++Builder 5.
I've tried to compile an application and it complains about not being
able
to find STLPMT.LIB - I can find no information on this LIB.
That's not a Boost library. It's a Borland library. On my
Strange. I've been using C++Builder (1-6) for YEARS and never come across
it. I'll check further.
Malcolm Smith
Analyst Programmer
Comvision Pty Ltd
http://www.comvision.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Beman Dawes
Sent: Tuesday, 18
Additionally, this LIB is referenced in the LIB/DLL produced by the BCB5.MAK
file supplied with boost.
Malcolm Smith
Analyst Programmer
Comvision Pty Ltd
http://www.comvision.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Beman Dawes
Sent: Tuesday, 18
On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 8:32 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
At 02:24 AM 3/13/2003, Daryle Walker wrote:
4. My testing was with a stock Boost 1.29.0 from a zip file. If the
CVS version of Boost already has fixes for CW-DS and/or CWP8.3, I'll
switch to that and apologize for wasting everyone's
Malcolm Smith wrote:
Hi all,
I just compiled the regex library under C++Builder 5.
I've tried to compile an application and it complains about not being
able
to find STLPMT.LIB - I can find no information on this LIB.
It's a BCB6 library for the stlPort implementation of the C++ standard
I cannot find 1.30. Where ?
I may have not used an explicit path for the MAKE operation. I will rebuild
it again.
Thanks.
Malcolm Smith
Analyst Programmer
Comvision Pty Ltd
http://www.comvision.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Edward
Malcolm Smith wrote:
I cannot find 1.30. Where ?
The 1.30 release is the upcoming one but one could download it from
SourceForge as a beta. I thought you might be trying that.
Evidently you are building with 1.29 or earlier. I don't see any STLPMT.LIB
in the bcb5.mak so you are picking it up
I have received an inquiry asking for a list of companies that are
using Boost to develop commercial software. If your company is using
Boost libraries in its products and is willing to have it be known,
I'd appreciate it if you post something or send me a private email to
that effect.
Thanks
Alisdair Meredith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Several of the boost libraries select functionality based on the result
of some compile-time test. The result is usually stored in a
BOOST_STATIC_CONST( bool, test::value );
The current Borland compiler does not
Chris Trengove [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think you can get rid of the compilation error just be qualifying the use
of value. For example,
typedef XY::value::type type;
I have recently been attempting to port Boost.Python to BCC and have come
across lots of examples of this. The
I've been to http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/ but 1.30.0 is not listed
(or I'm blind). Where is the beta ?
Malcolm Smith
Analyst Programmer
Comvision Pty Ltd
http://www.comvision.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Edward Diener
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Malcolm Smith wrote:
I've been to http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/ but 1.30.0 is not listed
(or I'm blind). Where is the beta ?
Carefully hidden here :)
http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/boost_1_30_0_b1.zip
Doug
Thanks for that.
Malcolm Smith
Analyst Programmer
Comvision Pty Ltd
http://www.comvision.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Douglas Paul Gregor
Sent: Tuesday, 18 March 2003 15:07
To: Boost mailing list
Subject: RE: [boost] Re: Re: Regex and
I've just checked in a small patch to address this warning:
cc-1460 CC: WARNING File = boost/boost/test/detail/wrap_stringstream.hpp, Line
= 90
Function function boost::wrap_stringstream::str is redeclared inline
after
being called.
wrap_stringstream::str()
^
There are gcc 2.96 (Redhat 7.3) compilation error for
boost/libs/python/test/opaque.cpp:
http://cci.lbl.gov/~rwgk/tmp/rc_1_30_0_opaque_fail.txt
More recent gcc's don't seems to suffer from this problem.
I am not sure this is important enough to delay the release any further.
David?
Ralf
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Beman
Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
At 03:40 PM 3/17/2003, Terje Slettebø wrote:
BOOST_NO_STRINGSTREAM
BOOST_NO_STD_WSTRING
BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T
Are you sure disabling wide character support is really the solution, or
that it is really fully disabled?
For
43 matches
Mail list logo
