[boost] Preliminary submission: Finite State Machine framework

Hi, Whenever I had to develop an FSM in the past, I chose either of the following paths: - For small and simple machines I often resorted to the IMHO ugly nested switch-case approach. - For bigger and more complex machines, I often used a code-generation approach because I failed to find a

[boost] start_vertex patch for depth_first_visit

It appears that depth_first_visit does not invoke the start_vertex visitors as the depth_first_search routines do. Here is a patch to correct that. Jeffrey *** depth_first_search.hpp.0Tue May 27 00:22:48 2003 --- depth_first_search.hpp

[boost] Re: shared_ptr/weak_ptr and thread-safety

Alexander Terekhov wrote: Russell Hind wrote: Trevor Taylor wrote: Who? Me? I think Peter meant Alexander I got the message. I'll post refcountthread_safety, typename integer_t once I'll have some time for it. It won't include atomic implementation(s), however. ;-)

[boost] Re: [BGL] Patch for nonrecursive DFS to fix stack overflow

Looks like my name didn't get added to my post. :( Bruce Barr ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Re: [boost] Preliminary submission: Finite State Machine framework

Hi Andreas, [...] An attempt at an easy-to-use FSM library that supports well-maintainable and code-expressive machines of almost any size and does not require a code generator can be found in the fsm directories in the boost-sandbox and here: