David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Doesn't seem to be in the archives. It's from Neal D. Becker 10 Mar
2003. Here is the entire message:
I really appreciate the boost rpms that have been made available. I
hope we
can improve one thing in the upcoming
Vladimir Prus said:
David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Doesn't seem to be in the archives. It's from Neal D. Becker 10 Mar
2003. Here is the entire message:
I really appreciate the boost rpms that have been made available.
I
hope we
can improve one
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 11:50 am, David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Boost.Python private email
Final changes promised for Wednesday night.
Those are done. I'd like to watch http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/ go
through one more successful test cycle.
*
At 04:02 AM 3/13/2003, Vladimir Prus wrote:
I believe that Malte Starostik is the right person for dealing with this
issue. I'm pretty sure the different is naming is difference between
Mandrake and Redhat, but have no idea how to fix it.
And, while we're on it, I think it would be much better
At 10:51 AM 3/12/2003, Jaakko Jarvi wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Beman Dawes wrote:
Here is my list of outstanding patches and fixes. It would be great if
we
could resolve the bulk of these for 1.30.0.
* tuples::apply
Did this every get resolved? Aleksey? Jaakko?
Aleksey's message on
Neal D. Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I reported this. A simple workaround, just remove the dependency from the
.spec file.
IIRC, it was libpython-devel. This is called python-devel on RH8. My
suggestion, just remove it from Requires:.
Just put a %if block in the .spec. I don't have
Beman Dawes wrote:
* [config] BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME
Status currently unknown. John? Aleksey?
Dave will take care of it after the release. It's not urgent in any way.
Aleksey
___
Unsubscribe other changes:
* Regex make boost work better patch from Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Maddock will investigate once new machine working
should be done soon.
* PRB with type_traits::is_member_function_pointer
Would prefer John Maddock or someone else more familiar with type
traits regeneration make this
At 11:42 AM 3/12/2003, Sam Partington wrote:
Daniel Frey wrote:
Beman Dawes wrote:
* Possible addition to operators library from Sam Partington
Daniel Frey and Sam discussing changes.
We need some discussion of it and I would like to see it in CVS and
thus in the regression tests for
At 07:59 AM 3/13/2003, John Maddock wrote:
* Regex make boost work better patch from Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Maddock will investigate once new machine working
should be done soon.
OK.
* PRB with type_traits::is_member_function_pointer
Would prefer John Maddock or someone else more
Here is my list of outstanding patches and fixes. It would be great if we
could resolve the bulk of these for 1.30.0.
If you resolve any of these issues, please let me know so I can clear it
off the list.
Thanks,
--Beman
* lexical_cast changes
Kevlin and Terje doing final tests on changes.
Beman Dawes wrote:
* Possible addition to operators library from Sam Partington
Daniel Frey and Sam discussing changes.
We need some discussion of it and I would like to see it in CVS and thus
in the regression tests for some time. When Sam started the proposal,
the branch for 1.30.0 has
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Beman Dawes wrote:
Here is my list of outstanding patches and fixes. It would be great if we
could resolve the bulk of these for 1.30.0.
* tuples::apply
Did this every get resolved? Aleksey? Jaakko?
Aleksey's message on Feb 15 had slipped by :(
Looking at his
Beman Dawes wrote:
Here is my list of outstanding patches and fixes. It would be great if we
could resolve the bulk of these for 1.30.0.
* [bgl] pass by value
Awaiting response from Jeremy
Per off-list discussion, I've comitted the changes. They are also merged to
RC branch. There may be
Daniel Frey wrote:
Beman Dawes wrote:
* Possible addition to operators library from Sam Partington
Daniel Frey and Sam discussing changes.
We need some discussion of it and I would like to see it in CVS and
thus in the regression tests for some time. When Sam started the
proposal, the
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Boost.Python private email
Final changes promised for Wednesday night.
Those are done. I'd like to watch http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/ go
through one more successful test cycle.
* [Boost.Python] rpms and small fix for RedHat
Awaiting reply. Dave?
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* [status/Jamfile] Jamfile patches for Borland
Need a decision. Dave?
I'm also not aware of these issues.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
___
Unsubscribe other changes:
I see new features being added to RC_1_30_0.
Is this the right balance of innovation and stability?
I've spent several days cleaning up RC_1_30_0 for a large number of platforms.
It takes a long time to do all the compilations and tests. Do I have to do this
all over again to salvage my
At 10:54 AM 3/12/2003, Vladimir Prus wrote:
Beman Dawes wrote:
Here is my list of outstanding patches and fixes. It would be great if
we
could resolve the bulk of these for 1.30.0.
* [bgl] pass by value
Awaiting response from Jeremy
Per off-list discussion, I've comitted the changes.
At 11:50 AM 3/12/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Boost.Python private email
Final changes promised for Wednesday night.
Those are done.
OK, removed from list.
I'd like to watch http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/ go
through one more successful test cycle.
Even
At 11:52 AM 3/12/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* [status/Jamfile] Jamfile patches for Borland
Need a decision. Dave?
I'm also not aware of these issues.
See http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/boost/1566296
Because it is a build related issue,
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Doesn't seem to be in the archives. It's from Neal D. Becker 10 Mar
2003. Here is the entire message:
I really appreciate the boost rpms that have been made available. I
hope we
can improve one thing in the upcoming release.
rpm -q --requires
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 11:52 AM 3/12/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* [status/Jamfile] Jamfile patches for Borland
Need a decision. Dave?
I'm also not aware of these issues.
See
23 matches
Mail list logo
