At 07:15 AM 5/30/2003, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
IMO it's worth to step back and try to answer a couple of big picture
questions:
Yes, that's a good idea.
1) What are the target audiences for the regression test results?
2) What kind of information these audiences are looking to find in
there?
Beman Dawes wrote:
One possible short-term fix might be to run the MPL tests separately,
and post them as a separate table.
That's what we plan to do, although format of the table probably going
to be different - please see below.
Long term, some kind of hierarchical approach might help with
At 03:29 PM 5/28/2003, Eric Friedman wrote:
I apologize if this has already been asked, but why aren't the
libs/mpl/test
sources included in regresssion testing? I know some tests are missing
and
some are perhaps as robust as they might be, but it seems some testing is
better than no testing.
Eric Friedman wrote:
I apologize if this has already been asked, but why aren't the
libs/mpl/test sources included in regresssion testing? I know some
tests are missing and some are perhaps as robust as they might be,
but it seems some testing is better than no testing.
Definitely, and
At 08:19 PM 5/28/2003, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
Eric Friedman wrote:
I apologize if this has already been asked, but why aren't the
libs/mpl/test sources included in regresssion testing? I know some
tests are missing and some are perhaps as robust as they might be,
but it seems some testing is
