Beman Dawes wrote:
Pavel,
Official patch 4 was released just now:
http://bdn.borland.com/article/0,1410,29793,00.html
Among bugs fixed is:
- The bcc compiler now compiles code containing a const member
function.
Hum... Interesting... Thanks for letting me know.
Could some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I am responsible for the overlap. This is due to an email getting lost.
The I/O review may be extended to make up for the overlap. I will make a
posting as soon as a solution is found.
In the meantime we will have two reviews running in parallel.
Paul Mensonides wrote:
Beman Dawes wrote:
#define A() 1
#define B(m) m 2
B(A)
I've run the above through the preprocessor and heres the output
/* Unit1.cpp 1: */
/* Unit1.cpp 2: */
/* Unit1.cpp 3: */
/* Unit1.cpp 4: */A 2
Tested using the preprocess option with BCB6Pro Update 4. This looks
Russell Hind wrote:
#define A() 1
#define B(m) m 2
B(A)
I've run the above through the preprocessor and heres the output
/* Unit1.cpp 1: */
/* Unit1.cpp 2: */
/* Unit1.cpp 3: */
/* Unit1.cpp 4: */A 2
Tested using the preprocess option with BCB6Pro Update 4. This looks
like what
Edward Diener wrote:
[...]
DllMain's DLL_THREAD_DETACH is a better design, I think you must realize
that you are dealing with a company with millions and millions of developers
Yeah. zillions of innocent programmers. http://tinyurl.com/6hlt
regards,
alexander. former MSDN-universal
Russell Hind wrote:
Sorry to say that the output is now incorrect. A2 instead of A 2.
Checking the preprocessor output for this gives
/* Unit1.cpp 9: */int main() {
/* Unit1.cpp 10: */std::cout A 2 std::endl;
/* Unit1.cpp 11: */return 0;
which is again correct. This is strange since I
Daniel Frey wrote:
Daniel Frey wrote:
No problem. IIRC it was Peter Dimov who came up with the safe-bool
idiom first. At least I saw it first from him. Another way which
works but results in worse error messages is this:
template class T, class B = ::boost::detail::empty_base
struct
FYI I've submitted it as QC#3629
Russell
Paul Mensonides wrote:
Russell Hind wrote:
Sorry to say that the output is now incorrect. A2 instead of A 2.
Checking the preprocessor output for this gives
/* Unit1.cpp 9: */int main() {
/* Unit1.cpp 10: */std::cout A 2 std::endl;
/* Unit1.cpp 11:
Statistics functionality would be extremely
interesting.
The idea would be to duplicate the basic notions of
the mathematical theory as C++ classes.
The conceptual hyrarchy (bottom to top) is as follows:
1. Probability distribution (implementation: random
number generator).
2. Random Object
Beman Dawes wrote:
But I really don't want to change compilers in the midst of a release
runup. So I've stuck a note on my calendar for March 12th to install the
patch.
If anyone thinks this is a problem, let me know.
Assuming a new version number for __BORLANDC__ it might throw out some
of
Kim Chang Han [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is my simple test code modified from embedding.cpp test code(by
Dirk Gerrits).
I successfully compiled, but my excutable raise heap error assertion
when the time freeing the string result of the function py.hello().
Can I prevent this error?
I
Phil Nash wrote:
The fact is that most (I would hope) of those that are subscribed to the
list know what a smart pointer is. Many would also make the extra connection
between smart POINTERs and general RESOURCE management.
Not sure even here we agree 100%. What is the precise scope of the
Philippe A. Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
int main()
{
optionalB b;
optionalC c;
foo(b);
//foo(c);
}
BTW implicit cast to reference types are not implicit under GCC, they have
to be called explicitly. Template casts do not
Kevin Atkinson wrote:
Is there any interest in a fixed point math library.
Well, I'm interested in a fixed point library :)
Especially if it can be used as a template argument in place of a
floating point type.
Using templates the
compiler can keep track of the radix point for you
Larry Evans wrote:
Would the GOF name, proxy, be too non-specific? Policy names might provide
the specifics (whether it's a pointer or a resource).
Proxy, if anything, sends the wrong message to me. The name suggests
'reference', rather then 'owner'
'bookkeeper' is the best I can come up
The news group advertised on the site,
news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel, gives no response. Has it
moved?
Thanks,
Noel
--
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender. Sender
does not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited.
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Jason House wrote:
Kevin Atkinson wrote:
Is there any interest in a fixed point math library.
Well, I'm interested in a fixed point library :)
Especially if it can be used as a template argument in place of a
floating point type.
Thanks.
Using templates the
Larry Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alisdair Meredith wrote:
Phil Nash wrote:
[snip]
Final disorganised point g When you think 'pointer' without a
context, what concept do you associate first? Resource-manager? Or
dereferencable? The very name suggests the latter to me! [Which
Noel Yap wrote:
The news group advertised on the site,
news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel, gives no response. Has it
moved?
Not if you get this reply, I do all my boosting through Gmane g
--
AlisdairM
___
Unsubscribe other changes:
Noel Yap [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The news group advertised on the site,
news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel, gives no response. Has it
moved?
Works for me. Your post appears there.
news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
Could it not just be called shared. After all it is merely a more general
term of shared_ptr. And the type of the resource kind of makes it implicit.
e.g.
sharedfile is a shared file. crystal.
Though this doesn't fit at all with non sharing policies.
Sam
Alisdair Meredith wrote:
Larry
Sam Partington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could it not just be called shared. After all it is merely a more general
term of shared_ptr. And the type of the resource kind of makes it implicit.
std::auto_ptr is a non-shared resource manager.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 09:15 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
Sam Partington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could it not just be called shared. After all it is merely a more
general
term of shared_ptr. And the type of the resource kind of makes it
implicit.
std::auto_ptr is a non-shared
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Noel Yap [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The news group advertised on the site,
news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel, gives no response. Has it
moved?
Works for me. Your post appears there.
Yes - this looks potentially rather useful for some tasks, especially embedded
systems.
Why on earth didn't the language include fixed point and/or fractional types?
As you observe, the increased accuracy compared to float (just a little too
small for some measurements like weights) but with half
Hi,
To make up for the schedule problems the formal review for I/O is extended
until March 11th. So there is no need to hurry for those willing finish their
variant review first.
As said before the variant review is still open until March 2nd.
Thomas
Boost Review Wizard
--
Dipl.-Ing.
-Original Message-
Behalf Of Alisdair Meredith
Subject: [boost] Re: resource manager naming
Larry Evans wrote:
Would the GOF name, proxy, be too non-specific? Policy names
might provide
the specifics (whether it's a pointer or a resource).
Proxy, if anything, sends the
Hi Aleksey
I have got mpl out of CVS 5 minutes ago.
Code that previously compiled fine now shows the following error:
d:\Data\boostCvsRoot\boost\boost\mpl\aux_\include_preprocessed.hpp(27) :
fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file:
'boost/mpl/aux_/preprocessed/msvc70/placeholder.hpp': No
Kevin Atkinson wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Jason House wrote:
One thought... It looks like the template parameter should be an integer
type (of course, right?)... I think that there is some way to cause a
non integer type to generate a compiler error. Of course, considering
other
Hi Andreas,
Aleksey just did a big round of renaming before the first official
release of MPL (including changes like int_c - int_, and placeholder
- placeholders); I believe that placeholder.hpp is obsolete and
should have been removed from CVS. In this case we could keep it for
managed_copy?
How about an abbreviated name?
Like rsrc_mgr? Although, I don't like that abbreviation for resource...
___
Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
I see in the Wiki a couple of comments about variance/std dev with n and n-1
being referred to at the denominator. Just to clear it up:
when it is a complete population the denominator should be n.
when it is a random sample it is n-1.
sample variance = sum(Xi - mean(X))^2/(n-1)
or more
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Andreas,
Aleksey just did a big round of renaming before the first official
release of MPL (including changes like int_c - int_, and placeholder
- placeholders); I believe that placeholder.hpp is obsolete and
should
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 13:58, Alisdair Meredith wrote:
[Could make config testing interesting if 0x0563 has fixes not present
in the Kylix release, 0x0570]
indeed.
I guess it's the first time, thanks to Borland's 2 branches (kylix /
Borland C++ Builder) using intertwined version numbers, that
Brian Gray wrote:
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 09:15 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
Sam Partington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could it not just be called shared. After all it is merely a more
general
term of shared_ptr. And the type of the resource kind of makes it
implicit.
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
Yes - this looks potentially rather useful for some tasks, especially embedded
systems.
Why on earth didn't the language include fixed point and/or fractional types?
Well in order for fractions to be really useful, that is to support exact
values
Philippe A. Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió en el mensaje
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Philippe A. Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
int main()
{
optionalB b;
optionalC c;
foo(b);
//foo(c);
}
BTW implicit cast to
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
You would like to be dealing with:
optionalB* and optionalD*
Yes, exactly.
but you can do this as well, so I figure that what you really
need is a 'dynamic-type preserving' conversion between these
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Jason House wrote:
Kevin Atkinson wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Jason House wrote:
One thought... It looks like the template parameter should be an integer
type (of course, right?)... I think that there is some way to cause a
non integer type to generate a
So then reverse resource_manager and get managed_resource, or just
managed.
Why not just resource? Management is implied anyway; that's the
reason for the existence of the class.
*laugh* I was thinking exactly the opposite. To me, the resource itself
is clear from the template parameter
Dave Gomboc wrote:
So then reverse resource_manager and get managed_resource, or just
managed.
Why not just resource? Management is implied anyway; that's the
reason for the existence of the class.
*laugh* I was thinking exactly the opposite. To me, the resource
itself
is clear from
From: Joel de Guzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave Gomboc wrote:
So then reverse resource_manager and get managed_resource, or just
managed.
Why not just resource? Management is implied anyway; that's the
reason for the existence of the class.
*laugh* I was thinking exactly the opposite.
Terje Slettebø wrote:
From: Joel de Guzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave Gomboc wrote:
So then reverse resource_manager and get managed_resource, or
just managed.
Why not just resource? Management is implied anyway; that's the
reason for the existence of the class.
*laugh* I was thinking
43 matches
Mail list logo
