Paul Mensonides [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[This is getting way off-topic for Boost. We should take this off-line or
over
to clc++m)
I'm done anyway. I've already made my case.
But you made it in a forum where it can't make much difference. If you
don't post this to csc++ it's too bad,
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Gregor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 13 November 2002 04:50 am, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
Paul Mensonides wrote:
This is unacceptable. What really needs to happen, is the
rules regarding declaration instantiation of template class
members
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Gregor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 12 November 2002 04:26 am, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
Well, since that particular reason of type deduction failure (attempting
to
call a member function on the object which type does not contain the
specified
Douglas Gregor wrote:
On Saturday 09 November 2002 07:21 pm, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
[snip some code...]
template typename T yes_tag is_callable_helper(
sink sizeof(T::operator()) *
);
[snip more code...]
Won't work if there are multiple overloads of operator()
Paul Mensonides wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Aleksey Gurtovoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, I also happened to think that would be a preferred way to get
equivalent of the hypothetical '__is_well_formed(...)' functionality.
However, assuming that we got that one or another way,
