On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sean, old boy, I'm astounded. Are you not aware that I've been doing
exactly this using emacs? Daily? For more than 20 years now? It's
called find-tag . . .
For the less Emacs-savvy, the speedbar package may be ideal. It shows
the functions
Most long time Perl programmers will scoff at IDEs, but the lack of
tools is part of the problem of Perl not being accepted by the corporate
IT community. Of course it is also a catch-22. Without a critical mass
of users, there isn't a financial incentive for companies to develop
such tools.
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 16:39 -0500, Tom Metro wrote:
I was skeptical that such things actually added to one's programming
efficiency. My friend wasn't an IDE junkie. He spent plenty of years
working on the command line and with text editors. His opinion was that
these bits of automation
After learning Quanta for web development I'm much more interested in
looking at improved coding tool for Perl. I've played with Eclipse a
little, and intend to get back to it when I have a a couple tuits. I'm
not interested in WYSIWYG editors. But here's something you basic text
editor
* Sean Quinlan sean at quinlan.org [2005/02/28 18:12]:
[...] But here's something you basic text
editor doesn't give you that I think Eclipse does. Function jumping (or
whatever it's called). I'd _LOVE_ to be able to click (or highlight and
meta-somthing, whatever) on a function or method call
From: Sean Quinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:12:00 -0500
After learning Quanta for web development I'm much more interested in
looking at improved coding tool for Perl. I've played with Eclipse a
little, and intend to get back to it when I have a a couple tuits.
--- Sean Quinlan mumbled on 2005-02-28 18.12.00 -0500 ---
Function jumping (or
whatever it's called). I'd _LOVE_ to be able to click (or highlight and
meta-somthing, whatever) on a function or method call and have the
editor skip directly to it's definition - even if it is from another
module
