On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 17:43:37 -0500, Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BT == Ben Tilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BT How was I confusing issues? What I meant is that calling mmap does
BT not use significant amounts of RAM. (The OS needs some to track
BT that the mapping exists, but
At 12:12 PM -0800 11/15/04, Ben Tilly wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 17:43:37 -0500, Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BT == Ben Tilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BT In Perl I'd expect it to be possible but fragile. If
Parrot could make
BT it possible and not fragile, that would be great.
BT I've also heard about Intel's large addressing extensions (keep 2GB
BT in normal address space, page around the top 2 GB, you get 64 GB
The extension referred to above concerns the 4 gig limit inherent in a 32 bit
address space with byte addressable memory. The 4 gig limit is on the
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:58:11 -0500, Aaron Sherman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:40:25 -0800, Ben Tilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 23:04:46 -0500, Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 13:22 -0800, Ben Tilly wrote:
[...]
Um,
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Ben Tilly wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:58:11 -0500, Aaron Sherman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:40:25 -0800, Ben Tilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 23:04:46 -0500, Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:46:15 -0500 (EST), Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Ben Tilly wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:58:11 -0500, Aaron Sherman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:40:25 -0800, Ben Tilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004
