Re: [Boston.pm] academic use of Perl

2005-03-01 Thread Jerrad Pierce
To be effective at growing the pool of Perl programmers I think Perl needs to be used in a general course that isn't specifically about Perl or some specialty that is already well entrenched with Perl. Exactly. The wolf book would make an excellent text-book for a beginner's guide to algorythms

Re: [Boston.pm] Certification

2005-03-01 Thread James Freeman
Here, here... The perl community already has a certification that matters and would convince any PHB that the person they were hiring was a good candidate. The Perl Advocacy question is a separate one for reasons I will show below. In short our current certification goes like this,

Re: [Boston.pm] (also) Perl

2005-03-01 Thread John Saylor
hi ( 05.02.28 21:07 -0500 ) James Linden Rose, III: However Mr. Shwartz's model of the problem does not reflect majority opinion with respect to the breadth of the issue, (especially as it seems to be peppered with idealism and anti-capitalism). whoa- idealism and anti-capitalism smells like

Re: [Boston.pm] (also) Perl

2005-03-01 Thread James Linden Rose, III
On Monday, February 28, 2005, at 10:54 PM, Ben Tilly wrote: In an interview what you just said would make me worried. You're using a technique that you don't understand. Interesting that you've imagined yourself in a position to be interviewing me. Not a very likely scenario though.

[Boston.pm] [ADMIN] Request from the list administrator

2005-03-01 Thread Ronald J Kimball
If people have more to add to the discussion on certification, please stay on topic and cease the personal attacks. Ronald ___ Boston-pm mailing list Boston-pm@mail.pm.org http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm

RE: [Boston.pm] Certification

2005-03-01 Thread John Redford
First, I would like to compliment and express broad general agreement with everything James Freeman said in his response to the following message. Second, I would like to express specific agreement with Adam Turoff's expression of the crux of the problem. Expressing agreement takes much less

Re: [Boston.pm] GUI builders, support tools

2005-03-01 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sean, old boy, I'm astounded. Are you not aware that I've been doing exactly this using emacs? Daily? For more than 20 years now? It's called find-tag . . . For the less Emacs-savvy, the speedbar package may be ideal. It shows the functions

Re: [Boston.pm] perl6/pugs (ook!)

2005-03-01 Thread Ian Langworth
I like bananas and have been using the Ook programming language and Ook# .Net framework for a large number of corporate projects. For example, since the phone conversations of many younger teenagers probably consists of apeish grunts, it is entirely logical to write cell phone applications in a

Re: [Boston.pm] perl6/pugs (ook!)

2005-03-01 Thread Ian Langworth
I like bananas and have been using the Ook programming language and Ook# .Net framework for a large number of corporate projects. For example, since the phone conversations of many younger teenagers probably consists of apeish grunts, it is entirely logical to write cell phone applications in a

RE: [Boston.pm] Bottom Up

2005-03-01 Thread John Tsangaris
Can someone remind me why Perl needs to be more popular? What actual problem will be solved? Are we running low on module developers? Running low on core developers? Is the existing code-base evaporating? Are there not enough t-shirt and book sales? How will we know when Perl is popular

Re: [Boston.pm] (also) Perl

2005-03-01 Thread Alex Brelsfoard
I think we're still getting ahead of ourselves here. YES, we are all Perl programmers and love Perl. That doesn't mean we have to see eye-to-eye on ANYTHING else. It'd be nice. But who are we kidding. We're all different. I bring this up to help wash over some of these extraneous issues:

[Boston.pm] THE NAZIS HAD A CERTIFICATION FOR PERL

2005-03-01 Thread Chris Devers
But then, you can't invoke Godwin deliberately, can you? Wasn't mentioning [implicitly, national] socialism close enough? No? Damn. -- Chris Devers, fascinated just how many thousands of words this thread has produced, and yet managed to clarify exactly nothing while doing so

Re: [Boston.pm] advocacy

2005-03-01 Thread Alex Brelsfoard
See, now we're talking Alex Brelsfoard wrote: What about a website advertising scheme? Make a really neat/interesting/technological website based out of Perl and then see if we could get some companies to advertsie it (such as O'Reilly, Apache, and Google)? Why make something that

Re: [Boston.pm] advocacy

2005-03-01 Thread Alex Brelsfoard
When it comes to large companies, that real estate becomes valuable territory and they're not going to donate it for free. The technology you use is an internal decision. It has no relevance to the customer. What is the business case for putting it out there? If you're going to ruin your

RE: [Boston.pm] THE NAZIS HAD A CERTIFICATION FOR PERL

2005-03-01 Thread Tolkin, Steve
Right. The horse is dead. Please stop beating it. Dear Ronald, as our fearless leader will you please ask everyone to stop all these threads on certification and advocacy. Now I know why there are literally millions of matches in Google. This topic draws in people like flies to

Re: [Boston.pm] academic use of Perl

2005-03-01 Thread Alex Brelsfoard
Adam Turoff wrote: - Another reason why Perl is a minority language is that it's not used in academic curricula. An interesting point. Sean Quinlan writes: I agree. I'd love to hear suggestions how to work on that. We teach some Perl at BU, both under the bioinformatics

Re: [Boston.pm] Bottom Up

2005-03-01 Thread Duane Bronson
5. Clean up CPAN. The egalitarian nature of CPAN is commendable. However, quality and activity vary widely and redundancy is rampant. A baitPerhaps we should require people to hold certifications before they contribute code./ You are right about CPAN. CPAN's hugeness and uneven quality is

Re: [Boston.pm] advocacy

2005-03-01 Thread Alex Brelsfoard
Strictly speaking I don't think advertisement did much for Java. Sure, you see lots of ads for Java related products now, which maintains a high visibility for Java, but they exist because the Java market exists. Sure it did. Again, we're talking more about managers and boss types. When a

Re: [Boston.pm] Bottom Up

2005-03-01 Thread John Saylor
hi ( 05.03.01 14:21 -0500 ) Greg London: What if O'Reilley (or someone) set up a website that did free (or low cost) online certification? what if you did that. What it requires is a community spirit, and a little bit of generousity from its members to grant it the possibility of being. i

Re: [Boston.pm] Bottom Up

2005-03-01 Thread Greg London
John Saylor said: hi ( 05.03.01 14:21 -0500 ) Greg London: What if O'Reilley (or someone) set up a website that did free (or low cost) online certification? what if you did that. brilliant. Rather than focus on the goal, shift focus on how impossible it appears to get there. never mind

Re: [Boston.pm] Bottom Up

2005-03-01 Thread John Saylor
hi ( 05.03.01 14:21 -0500 ) Greg London: What if O'Reilley (or someone) set up a website that did free (or low cost) online certification? John Saylor said: what if you did that. ( 05.03.01 15:59 -0500 ) Greg London: brilliant. Rather than focus on the goal, shift focus on how

Re: [Boston.pm] (also) Perl

2005-03-01 Thread Alex Brelsfoard
The crux of the problem, is that these questions aren't getting answered: - Can we create a certification that will deliver benefits X, Y and Z? Yes. No one said it would be easy or happen tomorrow. - Is certification a necessary precondition for X, Y and Z? - Aren't problems X', Y'

Re: [Boston.pm] Bottom Up

2005-03-01 Thread Greg London
John Saylor wrote: ( 05.03.01 14:21 -0500 ) Greg London: What if O'Reilley (or someone) set up a website that did free (or low cost) online certification? John Saylor said: what if you did that. ( 05.03.01 15:59 -0500 ) Greg London: brilliant. Rather than focus on the goal,

[Boston.pm] Anyone know of an alternative to perldoc.com?

2005-03-01 Thread Grant M.
Does anyone know of an alternative to the package listing for perl versions that used to be on perldoc.com? Perldoc.com has been unreachable for a couple of weeks now. I used it quite a bit to determine what modules I needed for specific versions of perl for software distributions, and it's a

Re: [Boston.pm] Anyone know of an alternative to perldoc.com?

2005-03-01 Thread Jesse Vincent
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 12:22:47AM -0500, Grant M. wrote: Does anyone know of an alternative to the package listing for perl versions that used to be on perldoc.com? Perldoc.com has been unreachable for a couple of weeks now. I used it quite a bit to determine what modules I needed for

Re: [Boston.pm] Anyone know of an alternative to perldoc.com?

2005-03-01 Thread Grant M.
Jesse Vincent wrote: you mean something like Module::CoreList? Yes, I mean Module::CoreList ;-). Thanks, that'll do it. Grant M. -- Grant M. NeonEdge...Web Pages by Design http://www.neonedge.com/ ___ Boston-pm mailing list

Re: [Boston.pm] GUI builders, support tools

2005-03-01 Thread andrew burke
Most long time Perl programmers will scoff at IDEs, but the lack of tools is part of the problem of Perl not being accepted by the corporate IT community. Of course it is also a catch-22. Without a critical mass of users, there isn't a financial incentive for companies to develop such tools.

Re: [Boston.pm] (also) Perl --appologizing

2005-03-01 Thread Alex Brelsfoard
I'm sorry everyone. When I first brought up the question of certification I was really just looking for a way to communicate to people who don't know anything about Perl. I love Perl. I think it can and does do some wonderful things. When I heard the sad story of someone arguing with his

Re: [Boston.pm] (also) Perl --appologizing

2005-03-01 Thread Greg London
Alex Brelsfoard said: I'm sorry everyone. Alex, you of all people have done nothing to apologize for. You wanted to find a way to make Perl more widely accepted. Had the conversation been allowed to takes its natural course, it might have petered out quickly or it might have come up with a

Re: [Boston.pm] perl6/pugs

2005-03-01 Thread Ben Tilly
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:02:08 -0500, Adam Turoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:39:30PM -0500, Gyepi SAM wrote: It must be: I am using LISP, after a long hiatus, and really liking it. I simply did not appreciate its power upon introduction six years ago. Yep. I never

Re: [Boston.pm] RPM building (was: Bottom Up)

2005-03-01 Thread Gyepi SAM
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 03:16:06PM -0500, Duane Bronson wrote: Is there a CPAN distribution just as there are Linux distributions? In other words, a collection of CPAN modules that one can install as a bundle rather than having to use the perl -MCPAN install module_that_wont_compile?

Re: [Boston.pm] perl6/pugs

2005-03-01 Thread Mike Burns
--- Ben Tilly mumbled on 2005-03-01 14.56.51 -0800 --- Here's an explanation of the Y-Combinator. It won't work in Perl because Perl doesn't do lexical binding of input parameters. JavaScript does and most should know that, so I'll do it in JavaScript. Also see The Little JavaScripter:

Re: [Boston.pm] Bottom Up

2005-03-01 Thread Greg London
Sean Quinlan said: OK. Please bear with me as I think while I type (brainstorm). How many under-employed Perl Mongers do we have in the Boston area who would be willing to semi-volunteer? Suggestions? Would anyone be interested in participating in this? I did three in-house training

Bundles, RPMs, Debs RE: [Boston.pm] RPM building (was: Bottom Up)

2005-03-01 Thread Ricker, William
Is there a CPAN distribution just as there are Linux distributions? In other words, a collection of CPAN modules that one can install as a bundle rather than ] I don't know of any CPAN distributions. CPAN the library has a few bundles that are Bundles. CPANPLUS the Module will do the

Re: [Boston.pm] OT: O'Reilly

2005-03-01 Thread Federico Lucifredi
Hello Uri, I have a bookish request: does anybody have an editorial contact at O'Reilly I can exchange a few ideas with? I am cooking a proposal for them and I need a few tips here and there. BT I'd start with http://www.oreilly.com/oreilly/author/intro.html. been there, done

Re: [Boston.pm] OT: O'Reilly

2005-03-01 Thread Uri Guttman
FL == Federico Lucifredi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BT I'd start with http://www.oreilly.com/oreilly/author/intro.html. FL been there, done that. What I need is someone to talk to *before* FL I send them the proposal, hence my hope someone might have an FL editor's email. and

Re: [Boston.pm] RPM building (was: Bottom Up)

2005-03-01 Thread Ben Tilly
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 18:01:13 -0500, Gyepi SAM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 03:16:06PM -0500, Duane Bronson wrote: [...] I don't know of any CPAN distributions. However, if you are on an RPM based system, you might try my ovid program

Re: [Boston.pm] OT: O'Reilly

2005-03-01 Thread Ben Tilly
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 23:35:40 +, Federico Lucifredi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Uri, I have a bookish request: does anybody have an editorial contact at O'Reilly I can exchange a few ideas with? I am cooking a proposal for them and I need a few tips here and there. BT

Re: [Boston.pm] (also) Perl

2005-03-01 Thread Ben Tilly
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 14:55:58 -0600 (CST), Alex Brelsfoard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My impression is that the language which is making the most inroads on traditional Perl areas is PHP. Is that because of the wonderful certifications that PHP has which Perl doesn't? Or is it because PHP is

Re: [Boston.pm] Bottom Up

2005-03-01 Thread Greg London
Greg London said: After that, I wrote Impatient Perl as an attempt to create a teach-yourself-perl-in-N-days book. It's about 130 pages long. Still an intro to perl, but takes the student/reader all teh way to object oriented programming and advanced regular expressions. It's licensed