On 9/13/06, William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13 Sep 2006, at 8:34PM, Dan Minette wrote:
I think she used some four letter words in response to the poll
that stated that somewhere about 30% to 35% of Americans believed that
the US
government was somehow involved in
On 9/13/06, Gibson Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dan,
I guess I missed that message in the bustle of my life.
As another after word, every single one of my Archt schoolmates
contacted in no way buys the official story. Every one of them cited
the pile-up of those vertical support
On Sep 13, 2006, at 4:24 PM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 05:49 PM Wednesday 9/13/2006, Gibson Jonathan wrote:
Yes, our friends and neighbors live an exceptionally rich fantasy
life.
On Sep 13, 2006, at 12:38 PM, William T Goodall wrote:
On 13 Sep 2006, at 8:34PM, Dan Minette wrote:
I
On Sep 13, 2006, at 7:29 PM, Dan Minette wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gibson Jonathan
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 3:24 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: What should we believe when there is no reliable
JohnR said:
True, oh so true. There are actually irrational people in America who
think that somehow the universe created itself. LOL.
Even more amazingly, there are people there who believe that the
universe was created by a God who was somehow not ever created.
I suppose Americans are
On 9/12/06, Richard Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JohnR said:
I may be wrong, because I do not have a lot of confidence in
history, but it is my
understanding that the One Hundred Years War that took place in Europe
following the Protestant Reformation had a huge impact on the
population
A thought-provoking article about the implications of
differing fertility rates based on political ideology
in the US:
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008831
JDG
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the
On 9/14/06, J.D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A thought-provoking article about the implications of
differing fertility rates based on political ideology
in the US:
Very interesting... somewhat counter-intuitive, too.
And would I be excused if I said, purely for humorous purposes,
F**king
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is why the Democrats will always lose: we lack the will to feed
poisonous lies to children to achieve our ends.
Uh huh.
- It tells students that the United States went to war in Iraq
because
of weapons of mass
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], John W Redelfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People extol the virtues of abortion
Not *all* people, Maru.
JDG
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Hobby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jdiebremse wrote:
...
The ABC television network -- a cog in the Walt Disney empire --
unleashed a promotional blitz in the last week for a new
docudrama
called The Path to 9/11. ABC has thrown its corporate might
behind
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Charlie Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good question. Where does devout become fanatical? I think you
may be onto something here.
When the choices of others are involved?
That's a good answer.
Of course, under this definition, the Easter Islanders would not be
On 9/14/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], John W Redelfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People extol the virtues of abortion
Not *all* people, Maru.
Not anybody that I know of. At best, it is a triage decision. At
worst, it is murder. Virtue doesn't appear
Gibson Jonathan wrote:
Because my simple napkin calc starts with the two eggs, stir
gestate, and then bake until brought to term... how can two hot-
cross-bun children share one soul? I suppose they could be half-
souls each, depending if Confucius rules apply and the difference
is
On 14 Sep 2006 at 3:37, William T Goodall wrote:
OS X also has a significant share in this market with several
supercomputing clusters in use.
http://www.apple.com/science/
Nope, don't see the American DoD listed there.
AndrewC
Dawn Falcon
___
Nick Arnett wrote:
Very interesting... somewhat counter-intuitive, too.
And would I be excused if I said, purely for humorous purposes,
F**king conservatives!
The problem is not with fvck, but with having children. If
conservatives were also gays, they could fvck as much as
they want and
JDG wrote:
Additionally, would you agree or disagree the federal regulators should
engage in political censorship of content on American airwaves,
either all the time, or near the time of an election?
And you only have _two_ parties. Here in Brazil, because of the
next election, humour
On 14 Sep 2006, at 7:42PM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 14 Sep 2006 at 3:37, William T Goodall wrote:
OS X also has a significant share in this market with several
supercomputing clusters in use.
http://www.apple.com/science/
Nope, don't see the American DoD listed there.
A quick Google
On 14 Sep 2006, at 6:46PM, Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/14/06, J.D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A thought-provoking article about the implications of
differing fertility rates based on political ideology
in the US:
Very interesting... somewhat counter-intuitive, too.
Is it? I always
I'd say if they ran F911 there would be a deliberate attempt to manipulate the
audience via (what I consider a manipulative work).
Damon.
Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
At 09:04 PM Wednesday 9/13/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/13/2006 7:26:15 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
_If_ humans have a spirit (which seemed to be a basic enough
assumption in the context not to have to state it explicitly :P) ,
All we
At 09:17 PM Wednesday 9/13/2006, William T Goodall wrote:
If pigs could fly we could bottle their farts and use them to build a
time machine Maru
If pigs could fly I'd give serious consideration to investing in pith helmets.
Quasihomophony Maru
-- Ronn! :)
While looking out for
At 10:00 PM Wednesday 9/13/2006, Ritu wrote:
Ronn Blankenship wrote:
IIRC there are some religions
which believe that the baby acquires a spirit or
whatever they call it when s/he takes his/her first breath
outside the womb.
From what was said to me during my pregnancies, I think the
On 9/14/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, if ABC had decided to air Farenheit 9/11 this weekend instead would
you all agree or disagree that such an action would be a bald-faced
attempt to slander Republicans and revise history right before Americans
vote in a major election?
I
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
At 04:40 PM Thursday 9/14/2006, Nick Arnett wrote:
[...] There are many things that I believe are wrong that
the government does not neet to try to fix.
And some believe that there are so many things wrong _with_ the
government that there's no way to fix them all . . . :P
-- Ronn! :)
At 04:53 PM Thursday 9/14/2006, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Hmm. That didn't work. Lemme try something else:
Guns, Germs, and Steel: A National Geographic Presentation
The Haves and Have-nots
http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2006/09/13/xena-no-more/
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=22045
http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/node/657
-- Ronn! :)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 14/09/2006, at 7:26 PM, Gibson Jonathan wrote:
Hey, there was a lot of mass and volume to be those structures and
it is little wonder some of it spread out. The point we are all
scratching our heads over is how they didn't topple off to one
side. None of these buildings {though
On 14/09/2006, at 8:58 PM, jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Charlie Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good question. Where does devout become fanatical? I think you
may be onto something here.
When the choices of others are involved?
That's a good answer.
Of course, under this
On 14/09/2006, at 8:59 PM, Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/14/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], John W Redelfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People extol the virtues of abortion
Not *all* people, Maru.
Not anybody that I know of. At best, it is a triage decision.
On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:34 AM, J.D. Giorgis wrote:
A thought-provoking article about the implications of
differing fertility rates based on political ideology
in the US:
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008831
Yeah, but it forgets that people's politics can change
On Sep 13, 2006, at 4:24 PM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
Only if you ass—u—me that whatever a soul is, it is contained within
a fertilized egg cell. All we can say for sure is that if a living
human being requires some sort of spirit or essence or katra or
whatever you call it then at some
On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:48 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is why the Democrats will always lose: we lack the will to feed
poisonous lies to children to achieve our ends.
Uh huh.
- It tells students that the United States went to
At 06:58 PM Thursday 9/14/2006, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:34 AM, J.D. Giorgis wrote:
A thought-provoking article about the implications of
differing fertility rates based on political ideology
in the US:
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008831
On 14 Sep 2006, at 9:37PM, William T Goodall wrote:
Is it? I always thought of the Democrats as the party of the man-
hating feminist lesbian gender theorists and the Republicans as the
'illiterate, barefoot and pregnant from menarche to menopause' party.
I should probably qualify that
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Release No.: 06-24
For Release: EMBARGOED UNTIL 10:00 a.m. EDT, September 14, 2006
Note to editors: High-resolution images to accompany this release are
online at http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/press/pr0624image.html.
Strange New Planet Baffles
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
...
Strange New Planet Baffles Astronomers
Washington, DC - Using a network of small automated telescopes known as
HAT, Smithsonian astronomers have discovered a planet unlike any other
known world. This new planet, designated HAT-P-1, orbits one member of a
pair of
It's not a planet, it's a giant light baffle.
Vilyehm
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess that I don't understand why it is invalid to also assume
that
warming will increase ocean temperatures, and so increase the number
of
storms.
I'm just referencing what I've read, John, Here's an article
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], PAT MATHEWS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We will know we've reached a turning point when we get a President who
puts
the entire nation on a war footing and does not put up with any
nonsense
from anyone. I'm keeping my eyes peeled for whoever's out there that
will do
it.
I did apologize to Herbert Hoover's ghost! But Hoover in the sense that
the sewage hit the fan on his watch and he dropped the ball.
http://idiotgrrl.livejournal.com/
From: jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
To: Killer Bs Discussion
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A while ago, somebody said This country isn't at war, only our
military is at war. I think that was profound. It bugs the heck out
of me, to put it mildly, that our leaders ask no one except the troops
to make sacrifices for the
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JDG said:
I think you are neglecting the possibility that one might actually
be
true and another might actually be wrong.
I'm clearly not neglecting that possibility and in fact in this thread
have been fairly open to it.
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brazilian's current drug civil war may have a body count of
this magnitude. If there was a way to trade 100,000 and solve
the drug problem, I think I would accept this price.
Easy for you to say. Make
At 10:54 PM Thursday 9/14/2006, PAT MATHEWS wrote:
But Hoover in the sense that the sewage hit the fan
That's what you get for trying to use a regular vacuum cleaner for
that purpose rather than a wet-dry model
-- Ronn! :)
___
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gibson Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because the USA may be the target of nuclear terrorism. OTOH,
nuclear terrorists might explode a bomb anywhere they can, just
to show they have it.
OK.
How does this make any difference? We faced nuclear megadeath
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think the downfall of Egypt (and WHICH downfalln too?) would
be due to resource depletion neccessarily, since the downfall was due to
conquest by external forces (with vastly superior organization,
resources, etc) at a time when
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matt Grimaldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Sharkey wrote:
] The Fool wrote:
] E. You know nothing. You are a Fvcking idiot and a troll.
] Maybe I missed a memo, but I thought we didn't do this kind of
] shit around here. IAAMOAC, and all that.
]
] Are we
On Sep 14, 2006, at 8:54 PM, jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A while ago, somebody said This country isn't at war, only our
military is at war. I think that was profound. It bugs the heck out
of me, to put it mildly, that our leaders ask no
50 matches
Mail list logo
