http://www.conservapedia.com/Fidel_Castro
Fidel Castro (born August 13, 1926, presumably died by 2009) was
the brutal communist dictator of Cuba from 1959 to 2008, (...)
I don't think the list admins realize that Conservapedia editors
are adding up minor vandalisms to make it a parody of
No, this one may be right. Fidel got too sick to rule and was followed by his
brother Raul(?).
Sent from my BlackBerry Smartphone provided by Alltel
-Original Message-
From: Alberto Monteiro albm...@centroin.com.br
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:41:18
To: Killer Bs \(David Brin et al\)
The Brin-L weekly chat has been a list tradition for over ten
years. Way back on 27 May, 1998, Marco Maisenhelder first set
up a chatroom for the list, and on the next day, he established
a weekly chat time. We've been through several servers, chat
technologies, and even casts of regulars over
Trent Shipley wrote:
No, this one may be right. Fidel got too sick to rule and was
followed by his brother Raul(?).
What is the _reliable_ source that Fidel is undead?
Alberto Monteiro
___
Sorry. I must read more carefully. I missed the retired, presumed dead
part.
tship...@deru.com wrote:
No, this one may be right. Fidel got too sick to rule and was followed by his
brother Raul(?).
Sent from my BlackBerry Smartphone provided by Alltel
-Original Message-
From:
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Trent Shipley wrote:
No, this one may be right. Fidel got too sick to rule and was
followed by his brother Raul(?).
What is the _reliable_ source that Fidel is undead?
Alberto Monteiro
How about Van Helsing's _Who's Who of Vampires_?
Because being a dictator is the creme de la creme of vampiredom. I don't have
to hunt them - I got me a ranch!
http://idiotgrrl.livejournal.com/
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:45:47 -0500
From: hob...@newpaltz.edu
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Re: Another Conserpadia accidental joke:
On 29 Dec 2009 at 22:22, Trent Shipley wrote:
The potential participant says he hates MediaWiki because it was
designed with a flat user model. It has no built in hierarchy and we
No, I hate it because it's basically the lowest common denomiator of
wiki-dom. It does a lot of things, but it's
On 29 Dec 2009 at 19:19, Nick Arnett wrote:
As long as it runs on Linux (that's the hosted environment) and we can reach
consensus AND it isn't a CPU hog (important for costs), I'm fine with
whatever. Memory and disk space seem to be non-issues for practical
purposes.
It should be fine, as
On 29 Dec 2009 at 22:44, Trent Shipley wrote:
The Foswiki community is actually positioning the product as what I call
an un-wiki. If you turn everything off it works like wikis were
originally intended to work with no workflow model and two levels of
heirarchy, administrators and
Based on the discussion, I'm dumping MediaWiki and installing Foswiki...
and it's not going entirely smoothly, but I'll get there.
Nick
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 29 Dec 2009 at 22:22, Trent Shipley wrote:
See above answers.
There's an effective page limit per-web (20,000), but you are not
limited in the number of webs and users you can create.
The biggest? Probably Google or Nokia's installs. (Foswiki is the
direct
12 matches
Mail list logo
