On 11/02/2009, at 12:14 PM, Max Battcher wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
in _The New York Times_ 'Darwinism Must Die So That Evolution May
Live' is an example.
Scientists don't talk about Darwinism, creationists do.
I can't think of a recent example by just about anyone of the term
William T Goodall wrote:
With the bicentennial of Darwin's birth and the 150th anniversary of
_The Origin of Species_ this year there's been a lot of news
coverage lately on 'Darwinism', and with the politicisation of the
subject by religionists and the misdirection favoured by those
With the bicentennial of Darwin's birth and the 150th anniversary of
_The Origin of Species_ this year there's been a lot of news coverage
lately on 'Darwinism', and with the politicisation of the subject by
religionists and the misdirection favoured by those trying to
confound the matter
William T Goodall wrote:
in _The New York Times_ 'Darwinism Must Die So That Evolution May
Live' is an example.
Scientists don't talk about Darwinism, creationists do.
I can't think of a recent example by just about anyone of the term
darwinism that was outside of the phrase social
I can make a clear distinction between libertarianism and syndico-anarchism
that has been making a comeback.
Also, I tend to equate libertariansim with social darwinism. Though both have
different histories and rationales both political-economic camps tend to
produce identical results
Trent Shipley wrote:
I can make a clear distinction between libertarianism and syndico-anarchism
that has been making a comeback.
Also, I tend to equate libertariansim with social darwinism. Though both have
different histories and rationales both political-economic camps tend to
produce
On Monday 2004-03-01 16:39, Julia Thompson wrote:
Trent Shipley wrote:
I can make a clear distinction between libertarianism and
syndico-anarchism that has been making a comeback.
Can you define syndico-anarchism for me?
Thank you.
Julia
My understanding of syndycho-anarchism is
