JDG wrote:
At 11:45 PM 6/12/2004 -0500 Julia Thompson wrote:
JDG wrote:
At 11:02 AM 6/12/2004 -0500 Robert Seeberger wrote:
--===1385683643==
Another poll on Hannity's site was poked this week.
I'm glad to see that the list conversation persisted at a high level
At 11:45 PM 6/12/2004 -0500 Julia Thompson wrote:
JDG wrote:
At 11:02 AM 6/12/2004 -0500 Robert Seeberger wrote:
--===1385683643==
Another poll on Hannity's site was poked this week.
I'm glad to see that the list conversation persisted at a high level while
I was gone.
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 11:45:02PM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
JDG wrote:
At 11:02 AM 6/12/2004 -0500 Robert Seeberger wrote:
--===1385683643==
Another poll on Hannity's site was poked this week.
I'm glad to see that the list conversation persisted at a high level
Another poll on Hannity's site was poked this week.
As of 9:10 the other night the results of Sean Hannitys poll,
asking, do you want Reagan on the $10 bill read as such: 75% yes 25%
no (1600 votes).
As of 8:10 the next morning the poll reads thusly, 28% yes 72% no
(8212 votes).
From The
--
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another poll on Hannity's site was poked this week.
As of 9:10 the other night the results of Sean Hannitys poll,
asking, do you want Reagan on the $10 bill read as such: 75% yes 25%
no (1600 votes).
Bah. Just put him on the $3, in
At 11:02 AM 6/12/2004 -0500 Robert Seeberger wrote:
--===1385683643==
Another poll on Hannity's site was poked this week.
I'm glad to see that the list conversation persisted at a high level while
I was gone.
YAWN
JDG
___
JDG wrote:
At 11:02 AM 6/12/2004 -0500 Robert Seeberger wrote:
--===1385683643==
Another poll on Hannity's site was poked this week.
I'm glad to see that the list conversation persisted at a high level while
I was gone.
YAWN
JDG
What, you don't have anything to add to
