--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rather than continuing to trade rhetorical points, perhaps you could
start by specifying those things that are broadly-accepted factual
inaccuracies - and not just partisan factual inaccuracies
... So that you can just
On 9/15/06, Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's one, though: NOBODY in the Clinton admin was called by
ANYBODY in Afghanistan who was ready to pick up the package
or whatever was their code for capturing Bin Laden and refused
to give the authorization. The film included such a scene,
On Sep 18, 2006, at 8:00 AM, Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/15/06, Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's one, though: NOBODY in the Clinton admin was called by
ANYBODY in Afghanistan who was ready to pick up the package
or whatever was their code for capturing Bin Laden and refused
to give the
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, if ABC had decided to air Farenheit 9/11 this weekend instead
would
you all agree or disagree that such an action would be a bald-faced
attempt to slander Republicans and revise history right before
Americans
vote in a
On 9/15/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally think that it would be good for the TV networks
to take on controversial atttudes.
Airing a factually inaccurate historical docu-drama? That is as much
like taking on controversial issues as going on a holiday cruise is
like
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/15/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally think that it would be good for the TV networks
to take on controversial atttudes.
Airing a factually inaccurate historical docu-drama? That is as much
like
On Sep 15, 2006, at 11:15 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/15/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally think that it would be good for the TV networks
to take on controversial atttudes.
Airing a factually inaccurate
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Hobby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jdiebremse wrote:
...
The ABC television network -- a cog in the Walt Disney empire --
unleashed a promotional blitz in the last week for a new
docudrama
called The Path to 9/11. ABC has thrown its corporate might
behind
JDG wrote:
Additionally, would you agree or disagree the federal regulators should
engage in political censorship of content on American airwaves,
either all the time, or near the time of an election?
And you only have _two_ parties. Here in Brazil, because of the
next election, humour
2006 17:57:15
To:Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Re: Keep Propaganda Off The Airwaves
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Hobby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jdiebremse wrote:
...
The ABC television network -- a cog in the Walt Disney empire --
unleashed a promotional blitz
On 9/14/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, if ABC had decided to air Farenheit 9/11 this weekend instead would
you all agree or disagree that such an action would be a bald-faced
attempt to slander Republicans and revise history right before Americans
vote in a major election?
I
At 04:40 PM Thursday 9/14/2006, Nick Arnett wrote:
[...] There are many things that I believe are wrong that
the government does not neet to try to fix.
And some believe that there are so many things wrong _with_ the
government that there's no way to fix them all . . . :P
-- Ronn! :)
At 02:55 PM Friday 9/8/2006, Dave Land wrote:
On Sep 8, 2006, at 6:45 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The ABC television network -- a cog in the Walt Disney empire --
And of course, I'd be curious how many letters you wrote to movie
On Sep 9, 2006, at 2:43 AM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 02:55 PM Friday 9/8/2006, Dave Land wrote:
If there was a political point to be made by teaching kids that
2+2=3, it would be no different to me: lies are lies, and teaching
kids lies as history is the beginning of the end.
IOW, if I
On Sep 8, 2006, at 10:30 PM, Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/8/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And of course, I'd be curious how many letters you wrote to movie
theatres to get them to keep Farenheit 911* off the screens
Moore's movie played in private theaters. ABC is using the public
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The ABC television network -- a cog in the Walt Disney empire --
unleashed a promotional blitz in the last week for a new docudrama
called The Path to 9/11. ABC has thrown its corporate might behind the
two-night production,
jdiebremse wrote:
...
The ABC television network -- a cog in the Walt Disney empire --
unleashed a promotional blitz in the last week for a new docudrama
called The Path to 9/11. ABC has thrown its corporate might behind the
two-night production, and bills it as a public service: a TV event,
On 9/8/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And of course, I'd be curious how many letters you wrote to movie
theatres to get them to keep Farenheit 911* off the screens
Fahrenheit 911 was slanted, hugely slanted. It raised questions that
could be interpreted as innuendo. It
Hi,
The ABC television network -- a cog in the Walt Disney empire -- unleashed a
promotional blitz in the last week for a new docudrama called The Path to
9/11. ABC has thrown its corporate might behind the two-night production, and
bills it as a public service: a TV event, to quote the ABC
19 matches
Mail list logo
