--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It wasn't even a side claim -I WAS MAKEING- it was
simply in response
to that discussion. So, still, if you want
references for that I know
you can find them, If you already do not believe
that then I doubt
you
- Original Message -
From: Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 7:41 PM
Subject: Bitter Mellons, Gin and Tonic, and a an Un- reasonable view.
other posts on this topic to boot.
1) Your doing it again, and this time,
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 7:41 PM
Subject: Bitter Mellons, Gin and Tonic, and a an Un- reasonable
view.
Yahoo, truncated my message, so can't refer to the
original text, but I think the request for citations
in this is entirely reasonable. The statement was made
that there is evidence that Hitler was appalled by
the Holocaust (paraphrased), which goes against any
popular view of his objectives.
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yahoo, truncated my message, so can't refer to the
original text, but I think the request for citations
in this is entirely reasonable. The statement was made
that there is evidence that Hitler was appalled by
the Holocaust
Jan Coffey wrote:
Dan used a portion of that statment out of context as if I were
defending Hittler and then reqested citations for that deffence.
I could easily be wrong, but I read Dan's response as a request
for evidence that Hitler was appalled at what was going on. I
know that was just a
Nah, one post cannot smother a reasonable discussion. The
fact of the matter is that you have not been successful in
persuading people to accept some of your main premises.
Godwin's Law = 1 a couple of threads ago.. This thread's history...
It can't be smothered because its already
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Sloan II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan Coffey wrote:
Dan used a portion of that statment out of context as if I were
defending Hittler and then reqested citations for that deffence.
I could easily be wrong, but I read Dan's response as a request
for
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Sloan II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan Coffey wrote:
Dan used a portion of that statment out of context as if I were
defending Hittler and then reqested citations for that deffence.
I could easily be wrong, but I read Dan's response as a request
for
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nah, one post cannot smother a reasonable discussion. The
fact of the matter is that you have not been successful in
persuading people to accept some of your main premises.
Godwin's Law = 1 a couple of threads ago.. This thread's
10 matches
Mail list logo
