-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Kevin Tarr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: zondag 22 september 2002 18:19
Aan: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Onderwerp: RE: [Brin-l] RE: Changeover... topic identifiers?
File: ATT0.txt; charset = Windows-1252
I get your messages this way, as an
Nick Arnett wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Erik Reuter
...
How do you do that? From is the individual person's email address who
sent the message.
Actually, the From field on this list is the bounces address, which
Robert Seeberger wrote:
We will be making available to every American who is qualified, by virtue
of the Constitution, the opportunity to run for president.
Which is kind of ironic, as I think Rupert himself fails to qualify.
There were enough issues when an Australian wanted to own a US TV
http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/ptech/09/22/micro.fuel.cells.ap/index.html
Alternative power source would replace rechargeable batteries
Cell phones free from nightly recharges. Laptop computers that run and run
without needing an outlet. Pocket TVs with enough power to show a Ken Burns
Rob wrote.
Jerry Pournelle is reporting that Dr. Robert L. Forward has passed
away. His source is an email from the president of the SFWA.
R.I.P.
Robert L. Forward obit - apparently prepared by Dr. Forward himself:
http://www.sfwa.org/news/forward.htm
JDG said:
I disagree with this.There is no reason why a high school teenager
flipping burgers at McDonald's *should* be paid enough to afford a
two-bedroom apartment. And, I should note, the very definition of a
minimum wage job is what you pay the lowest-rung worker, which would be a
Julia Thompson wrote:
Ronn Blankenship wrote:
The word denigrating has such a negative ring to it
People in the US have been fired from their jobs for using it properly
because others who obviously did not know what the word means took offense
because they thought it was related to that
Robert Seeberger wrote:
Please note that I offered not a single word of criticism. I didnt comment
on what you said at all.
What I did was clarify what I saw in Rays comments.
In reading those comments again, I think I could say to Ray that he could
have been a bit more diplomatic also.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Ray Ludenia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: maandag 23 september 2002 15:37
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: [Brin-l] rapturism
I hadn't heard about *that* one. The only one I knew about was
niggardly.
We're not going to restart the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of The Fool
...
Eh? How is this an attack on free speech? I don't agree with the
tactics,
but I don't exactly see Fox as a great defender of free speech, either.
It's an organization that is
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 02:14:16PM +0100, Rik Burke wrote:
As you say. But not everybody who is on minimum wage are flipping
burgers to earn a bit of pocket money whilst they're at high school;
infact many of them aren't. A living wage for for a family of one
adult and two children is in the
John D. Giorgis wrote:
Only *one* Brin-L poster bothered to object to this incredibly insulting
and slanderous comment. This second poster did not attack the first
poster, but simply asked if the first post ever felt guilty about casting
such incredibly vicious insults when, by her own
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Apparently Ronincats has heard the call of the Rapture...
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
At 20:58 20-09-2002 -0400, John Giorgis wrote:
Well, I haven't exactly been dictated to. I, after all, ignored the
advice of my parents and decided to continue serving my country.
So, have you signed up for military service yet? I mean, you want to serve
your country, and are
At 22:19 22-09-2002 -0500, The Fool wrote:
All of this logic I expect from a right wing. It's the job of the rich
to make themselves richer at the expense of the poor. Right wing
politicians have always consistently done this.
Well, at least they deserve credit for being consistent. :-)
Adam C. Lipscomb wrote:
It's Joss Whedon's new series - SF on the surface, but
stuffed full of Western-ey Goodness.
Including a train robbery :-)
-- Matt
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
At 06:07 23-09-2002 -0400, Kevin Tarr wrote:
We will be making available to every American who is qualified, by virtue
of the Constitution, the opportunity to run for president.
Which is kind of ironic, as I think Rupert himself fails to qualify.
There were enough issues when an Australian
- Original Message -
From: Matt Grimaldi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: US Releases National Security Policy Statement
It is really a significant departure, not just from
the containment doctrine but from widely
--- Baardwijk, J. van wrote:
Van: Ray Ludenia [wrote]:
I hadn't heard about *that* one. The only one I
knew about was
niggardly.
We're not going to restart the thread chix and
niggards again, are we? :-)
Hey, why not? That was 3.5 years ago (early 1999).
There must be lots of
Erik asked:
As you say. But not everybody who is on minimum wage are flipping
burgers to earn a bit of pocket money whilst they're at high school;
infact many of them aren't. A living wage for for a family of one
adult and two children is in the region of $30k a year, which breaks
down
- Original Message -
From: Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 3:29 PM
Subject: RE: how religious fanatics attack free speech
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of The Fool
...
Dan Minette wrote:
It is really a significant departure, not just from
the containment doctrine but from widely accepted
American principles such as: America will not strike
first, Buchanan said. And to elevate it to the
status of a doctrine--without incorporating specific
Iraq Vows Not to Abide by Any New U.N. Vote
Limiting Agreement to Existing Terms Suggests Baghdad
By Rajiv Chandrasekaran
Washington Post Foreign Service
Sunday, September 22, 2002; Page A28
BAGHDAD, Iraq, Sept. 21 -- Iraq said today that it
would not abide by any new U.N. Security Council
The stat I have on that doesn't give details, so I assume no, it doesn't
mean 60% of households of one adult and two children.
Does that make the above stat irrelevant? I don't think so. It was
supposed to be indicative of a situation, nothing more.
Ok, 60% of Americans don't earn enough to
Pardon me, but does this stance read like If you threaten us, we'll call
your bluff to anyone else?
From: J.D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Iraq: Take This Reso and Shove It
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
An interesting article on copyrights:
http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/09/23/133228mode=nocomme
nttid=141
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Russell asked:
Ok, 60% of Americans don't earn enough to count as a living wage *if
they're
a single parent with two kids*. But there's a substantial proportion of
people who (may) have no children but earn approx. half that sum or
lesss.
Do you have the numbers on this, or are you just
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 07:55:58PM +0100, Rik Burke wrote:
Erik asked:
As you say. But not everybody who is on minimum wage are flipping
burgers to earn a bit of pocket money whilst they're at high school;
infact many of them aren't. A living wage for for a family of one
adult and
-Original Message-
From: Matt Grimaldi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Brin-l] [TV] Anyone watch Firefly?
Adam C. Lipscomb wrote:
It's Joss Whedon's new series - SF on the surface, but
stuffed
Erik said:
The stat I have on that doesn't give details, so I assume no, it doesn't
mean 60% of households of one adult and two children.
Does that make the above stat irrelevant? I don't think so. It was
supposed to be indicative of a situation, nothing more.
Whatever. Quote
I'll see what I can do,When on Friday is your deadline?
Also, what is your pool like?
JDG
I just have to pick one team either with or against the spread. Just one.
If I had picked the Lions, I'd have gotten two points, as it was I took the
packers and lost two. Simple as that, one team
--- Julia Thompson wrote:
The male zebra reported near me spent a fair bit of
time in the same pen
with members of other species, so he was getting at
least *some* socializing.
And then we spotted extra zebras last week, and were
able to do a
reasonably good sexing of the extras.
The male zebra reported near me spent a fair bit of time in the same pen
with members of other species, so he was getting at least *some*
socializing.
And then we spotted extra zebras last week, and were able to do a
reasonably good sexing of the extras. Upshot: Mr. Zebra has 2 Ms.
Zebras for
From: Rik Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Housing Out of Reach
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:32:13 +0100
Erik said:
Well, it's not quite random. It's relevant, in the way I argued. Do
you
disagree with the conclusions I drew from it?
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 12:32:13AM +0100, Rik Burke wrote:
My point, however, I think still stands. Which was that 60% of the US
population earn les than twice the minimum wage, or thereabouts.
That wasn't what you wrote.
And the fact that they aren't a one-parent family doesn't mean that
- Original Message -
From: Russell Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: Housing Out of Reach
From: Rik Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Housing Out of Reach
- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: Zebra update
Deborah Harrell wrote:
--- Julia Thompson wrote:
The male zebra reported near me spent a fair bit of
time in the same pen
WELLINGTON (Reuters) - New Zealand's main advocate for
children has branded as psychological abuse the naming
of a child after a notorious criminal gang.
Commissioner for Children Roger McClay said he received
a complaint about a baby boy named Triple M Rogue, which
is short for Mighty Mongrel
Julia wrote:
The *other* thing I'm wondering is if I'm ever going to get the
question, Mommy, what are those two zebras doing? as we drive by
and
one is on top of another
wondering how I'll answer it if it comes up
Just be honest, but not too blunt.
Reminds me of a story - right before
Gary wrote:
WELLINGTON (Reuters) - New Zealand's main advocate for
children has branded as psychological abuse the naming
of a child after a notorious criminal gang.
Commissioner for Children Roger McClay said he received
a complaint about a baby boy named Triple M Rogue, which
is short
http://homepage.mac.com/leperous/.Pictures/ashcroft.jpg
http://homepage.mac.com/leperous/.Pictures/enemy2.jpg
http://homepage.mac.com/leperous/PhotoAlbum1.html
Somebody doesnt like Bush.
xponent
Funny Though Maru
rob
___
--- Adam C. Lipscomb wrote:
Gary wrote:
WELLINGTON (Reuters) - New Zealand's main advocate
for
children has branded as psychological abuse the
naming
of a child after a notorious criminal gang.
Commissioner for Children Roger McClay said he
received
a complaint about a baby boy
http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;$sessionid$S0SQ03RFJ3ZA1QFIQMGSF
FWAVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2002/09/19/nmoz19.xmlsSheet=/news/2002/09/19/ixworld.
html
Travellers can beat the misery of mosquitoes with a computer program that
paralyses the insect's wings by emitting a high-frequency
43 matches
Mail list logo
