--- Jeroen van Baardwijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Stardate 20030626.2044, Jan Coffey wrote:
Exactly! What you propose for the ICC is representative governance, but
you
don't use that same system for your own country.
What do you mean? We DO use representative governance!!! You
At Stardate 20030626.0002, Jan Coffey wrote:
IIRC, that's not going to happen: the EU recently decided NOT to
federalise.
Yes and the lack of the other two branches is troubeling.
The EU doesn't have these three branches yet because it's not a country;
the EU is a body in which a number of
--- Jeroen van Baardwijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Stardate 20030626.0002, Jan Coffey wrote:
IIRC, that's not going to happen: the EU recently decided NOT to
federalise.
Yes and the lack of the other two branches is troubeling.
The EU doesn't have these three branches yet
At Stardate 20030624.2056, Jan Coffey wrote:
Personaly I see the ICC as a step twards European federalization. I think
that is a good thing for Europe, but not for the States. It's too much too
fast. Let Europe federalize first and learn what the difficulties of such
a system are.
IIRC, that's
--- Jeroen van Baardwijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Stardate 20030624.2056, Jan Coffey wrote:
Personaly I see the ICC as a step twards European federalization. I think
that is a good thing for Europe, but not for the States. It's too much too
fast. Let Europe federalize first and
Okay... If Outlook Express crashes before I finish writing this message, I
will give up and not bother replying.
One might argue that the Vietnamese were not using herbicides so
extensively
at the time, and certainly never asked to have it forced upon them in
such
quantities.
Which
