So if this is correct, what is the difference between a black hole and a naked
singularity?
The article describes an event horizon shrinking or growing in relation to a
black hole's apparent horizon, but isn't Hawking saying that the apparent
horizon is real and the event horizon just doesn't exist? In which case how can
a black hole have both?
~Ellen
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:28:28 -0600
Subject: Stephen Hawking: There are no black holes
Notion of an 'event horizon', from which nothing can escape, is
incompatible with quantum theory, physicist claims.
http://www.nature.com/news/stephen-hawking-there-are-no-black-holes-1.14583
___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
