bug#26032: Indenting in tabulars without

Hi Arash, Arash Esbati writes: > I did some testing, your suggestion with > (if (natnump (- (current-column) 1)) > (max (+ 2 beg-col) > (- (current-column) 1)) > (+ 2 beg-col)) > seems to do the job. Do you have any other idea? I think that the

bug#26032: Indenting in tabulars without

Arash Esbati writes: > Ikumi Keita writes: > >> I'm afraid that the fix has to be reconsidered. > > And I was afraid that this would happen; it seemed just too easy ;-) > >> The current code does not work as expected when the whole tabular >> environment

bug#26032: Indenting in tabulars without

Ikumi Keita writes: Hi Keita, > I'm afraid that the fix has to be reconsidered. And I was afraid that this would happen; it seemed just too easy ;-) > The current code does not work as expected when the whole tabular > environment itself is indented like the following

bug#26032: Indenting in tabulars without

Hi Arash, > I've just pushed a change with `natnump' to git. I'm afraid that the fix has to be reconsidered. The current code does not work as expected when the whole tabular environment itself is indented like the following examples. \begin{table} \begin{tabular}{ll}

bug#26032: Indenting in tabulars without

Ikumi Keita writes: >> Alas, `wholenump' is not available in XEmacs. > > In XEmacs, `natnump' is available. It is available in GNU Emacs, too, > and already used in latex.el and tex-buf.el. Hi Keita, great, thanks a lot. I've just pushed a change with `natnump' to git. (I

bug#26032: Indenting in tabulars without

Hi Mosè, Mosè Giordano writes: >> 2017-03-08 20:43 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati : >> > have you been writing many tables lately? ;-) Tough luck, really! I did exactly one table, with side effects ;-) >> My suggest to guard (- (current-column) 1) with a (wholenump ...)