Hi all,
Now I have some spare time, so I'd like to continue to discuss what we
should do about this issue.
I'm now a bit inclined to take the option (2) and ask gs-devel to
provide suitable Postscript(?) code for preview-latex. What do others
think?
Regards,
Ikumi Keita
> Ikumi Keita
> David Kastrup writes:
>> Thanks for your advice, the attached patch works well. The foreground
>> color of the generated image matches with the default face of emacs
>> without `preview-pdf-color-string', at least for gs 9.27 on my machine.
Ah, my bad, I was looking at the outcome of
> David Kastrup writes:
> The current code is already a sledgehammer that looks like a "not again"
> approach of evading yet another changed API. Looking at the history of
> the recommended replacements, I see that the Ghostscript developers
> state that some of those were removed in some
[Adding auctex-de...@gnu.org in To: field may result in too many
duplicated delivery of this message, so I refrain from doing so.]
Hi David and all,
> David Kastrup writes:
> It never was a problem for myself since my windows are black on white.
> This code is for people who expect
Ikumi Keita writes:
>> David Kastrup writes:
>>> Are you thinking that it isn't fruitful to follow up the development of
>>> ghostscript every time incompatible change is introduced?
>
>> No since the changes tend to be completely arbitrary. It's absolutely
>> not fruitful but
> David Kastrup writes:
>> Are you thinking that it isn't fruitful to follow up the development of
>> ghostscript every time incompatible change is introduced?
> No since the changes tend to be completely arbitrary. It's absolutely
> not fruitful but exasperating. That doesn't mean that
Ikumi Keita writes:
> Hi David,
>
>> David Kastrup writes:
>> The usual "oh, we decided change is good and clobbered over the previous
>> API." Presumably one of the listed hooks can be used instead, possibly
>> mimicking what the mentioned patch does to lib/pdf2dsc.ps .
>
> Are you
Hi David,
> David Kastrup writes:
> The usual "oh, we decided change is good and clobbered over the previous
> API." Presumably one of the listed hooks can be used instead, possibly
> mimicking what the mentioned patch does to lib/pdf2dsc.ps .
Are you thinking that it isn't fruitful to
