bug#58005: 13.1.4; Can't work with indirect buffers

2024-04-23 Thread Paul Nelson
Hi Ikumi, > Ah, I see. Thanks for confirmation. I didn't try region preview. The > previews do appear in the indirect buffer if I type C-c C-p C-b etc. > > I expect you see what I described if you type C-c C-p C-d in the > indirect buffer. OK, good -- we're on the same page then. For whatever

bug#70455: [PATCH] Add new user option `preview-leave-open-previews-visible'

2024-04-23 Thread Paul Nelson
Sounds good, thanks! Paul ___ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex

bug#58005: 13.1.4; Can't work with indirect buffers

2024-04-23 Thread Ikumi Keita
Hi Paul, > Paul Nelson writes: > For me, previews work fine in indirect buffers with this patch (based > on 20 mins of usage). I don't see anything like what you described > (previews appearing in the base buffer). Ah, I see. Thanks for confirmation. I didn't try region preview. The

bug#70455: [PATCH] Add new user option `preview-leave-open-previews-visible'

2024-04-23 Thread Ikumi Keita
Hi Paul, > Paul Nelson writes: > Please see attached. Thanks, best, Paul Thanks, but it is half of what I wanted :-) I added a paragraph to your propsal as the attached patch. Can you confirm it? Regards, Ikumi Keita #StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine #Gaza #StopMassiveKilling

bug#58005: 13.1.4; Can't work with indirect buffers

2024-04-23 Thread Ikumi Keita
Hi Paul and Vangelis, > Paul Nelson writes: >> Ah, I see. Thanks for confirmation. I didn't try region preview. The >> previews do appear in the indirect buffer if I type C-c C-p C-b etc. >> >> I expect you see what I described if you type C-c C-p C-d in the >> indirect buffer. > OK, good

bug#58005: 13.1.4; Can't work with indirect buffers

2024-04-23 Thread Vangelis Evangelou
Can you try the following command on terminal? Replace auctex-dir below with our auctex directory. patch -ruN -d auctex-dir < indirect2.patch On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 at 12:30, Paul Nelson wrote: > > Sorry, I forgot to reply all in my previous email. The patch is attached > here. > > > > Sorry to

bug#58005: 13.1.4; Can't work with indirect buffers

2024-04-23 Thread Paul Nelson
> Can you try the following command on terminal? Replace auctex-dir below with > our auctex directory. > patch -ruN -d auctex-dir < indirect2.patch I'm trying this from the latest origin/master, but happy to try something else if you think that'd be a good idea. auctex % patch -ruN -d . <

bug#70455: [PATCH] Add new user option `preview-leave-open-previews-visible'

2024-04-23 Thread Paul Nelson
> I'd like to have updates in the documentation. New customize option is > probably overkilling. > > > (presumably by sending a patch on top of the current one, to this > > thread?) > > Yes, please. Please see attached. Thanks, best, Paul 0001-Adjust-docs.patch Description: Binary data

bug#58005: 13.1.4; Can't work with indirect buffers

2024-04-23 Thread Vangelis Evangelou
Sorry, I forgot to reply all in my previous email. The patch is attached here. Original message Hi Ikumi. Sorry I missed preview.el.in. Yes, I can change that too. Regarding `TeX-master-file', I don't know what is the correct order that the various conditions need to be checked.

bug#58005: 13.1.4; Can't work with indirect buffers

2024-04-23 Thread Paul Nelson
> Sorry, I forgot to reply all in my previous email. The patch is attached here. > Sorry to turn this thread into "git tech support", but when I try applying this patch using "magit-apply", I get the error: 128 git … am --3way -- /Users/au710211/.emacs.d/elpaca/repos/auctex/indirect2.patch

bug#58005: 13.1.4; Can't work with indirect buffers

2024-04-23 Thread Ikumi Keita
[ Please keep Cc: 58...@debbugs.gnu.org when you reply so that the record remains in the bug tracker. ] > Vangelis Evangelou writes: > Regarding `TeX-master-file', I don't know what is the correct order that > the various conditions need to be checked. There might be a situation where >

bug#58005: 13.1.4; Can't work with indirect buffers

2024-04-23 Thread Paul Nelson
> A brief testing didn't show fatal behavior. Here are two notes I noticed: > 1. In indirect buffer, preview-latex doesn't work. All preview images >appear in the base buffer. > 2. TeX Fold mode works independently in indirect and base buffers. > > I suppose there will be dissatisfied users

bug#70455: [PATCH] Add new user option `preview-leave-open-previews-visible'

2024-04-23 Thread Ikumi Keita
Hi Paul, > Paul Nelson writes: > Yes, that's right. This behavior could just as well be its own > customization option, perhaps "preview-indicate-regeneration" > (default: t), independent of the option > "preview-leave-open-previews-visible" just added; let me know if you'd > prefer that.

bug#58005: 13.1.4; Can't work with indirect buffers

2024-04-23 Thread Ikumi Keita
Hi, > Paul Nelson writes: >> Can you try the following command on terminal? Replace auctex-dir below with >> our auctex directory. >> patch -ruN -d auctex-dir < indirect2.patch > I'm trying this from the latest origin/master, but happy to try > something else if you think that'd be a good

bug#58005: 13.1.4; Can't work with indirect buffers

2024-04-23 Thread Paul Nelson
> I used > patch -p1 < indirect2.patch > in the top directory of the local git repo and took care of the rejected > hunks manually. > Thanks Ikuya, I did this just now and tried the patch out (and have attached the master-relative patch that I obtained after merging, in case it's of convenience