Re: bash32-019 can't be applied

2007-08-24 Thread VMiklos
Hello, Na Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:47:43PM -0400, Chet Ramey [EMAIL PROTECTED] pisal(a): after applying bash32-001..bash-018 patches, i can't apply bash32-019. is this expected? Nope. I just applied patches 1-25 to a freshly-unpacked copy of bash-3.2 without any failures. okay, sorry

Re: Numbering of items during completion

2007-08-24 Thread Chet Ramey
Gerrit Sangel wrote: Hello list, I have several files with unicode characters in the file names. But I am using a German keymap, which only has a limited amount of characters mapped to it. The problem now is, if I want to change into a directory or open a file which has, say, a Korean

Bash-3.2 Official Patch 18

2007-08-24 Thread Chet Ramey
BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 3.2 Patch-ID: bash32-018 Bug-Reported-by:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-URL:

Bash-3.2 Official Patch 19

2007-08-24 Thread Chet Ramey
BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 3.2 Patch-ID: bash32-019 Bug-Reported-by:Thomas Loeber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-URL:

Bash-3.2 Official Patch 21

2007-08-24 Thread Chet Ramey
BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 3.2 Patch-ID: bash32-021 Bug-Reported-by:BAGSHAW Paul RD-TECH-REN [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-URL:

Bash-3.2 Official Patch 23

2007-08-24 Thread Chet Ramey
BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 3.2 Patch-ID: bash32-023 Bug-Reported-by:Chet Ramey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-ID: Bug-Reference-URL: Bug-Description: When an error occurs during the pattern removal word

Bash-3.2 Official Patch 24

2007-08-24 Thread Chet Ramey
BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 3.2 Patch-ID: bash32-024 Bug-Reported-by:Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-URL: http://bugs.gentoo.org/177095

Readline-5.2 Official Patch 6

2007-08-24 Thread Chet Ramey
READLINE PATCH REPORT = Readline-Release: 5.2 Patch-ID: readline52-006 Bug-Reported-by:Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-URL: http://bugs.gentoo.org/177095

Readline-5.2 Official Patch 7

2007-08-24 Thread Chet Ramey
READLINE PATCH REPORT = Readline-Release: 5.2 Patch-ID: readline52-007 Bug-Reported-by:Tom Bjorkholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-URL:

Bash-3.2 Official Patch 22

2007-08-24 Thread Chet Ramey
BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 3.2 Patch-ID: bash32-022 Bug-Reported-by:Chet Ramey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-ID: Bug-Reference-URL: Bug-Description: POSIX specifies that the `read' builtin invoked from

Re: Readline-5.2 Official Patch 7

2007-08-24 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 24 August 2007, Chet Ramey wrote: READLINE PATCH REPORT = Readline-Release: 5.2 Patch-ID: readline52-007 is this one going to be released as a bash patch as well ? i see readline patches 5/6 match a bash patch,

Re: Readline-5.2 Official Patch 7

2007-08-24 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 24 August 2007, Eric Blake wrote: According to Mike Frysinger on 8/24/2007 3:03 PM: Readline-Release: 5.2 Patch-ID: readline52-007 is this one going to be released as a bash patch as well ? i see readline patches 5/6 match a bash patch, but not this one ... bash32-025 has

Re: Readline-5.2 Official Patch 7

2007-08-24 Thread Chet Ramey
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Friday 24 August 2007, Chet Ramey wrote: READLINE PATCH REPORT = Readline-Release: 5.2 Patch-ID: readline52-007 is this one going to be released as a bash patch as well ? i see readline patches

Re: Readline-5.2 Official Patch 7

2007-08-24 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Mike Frysinger on 8/24/2007 3:03 PM: Readline-Release: 5.2 Patch-ID: readline52-007 is this one going to be released as a bash patch as well ? i see readline patches 5/6 match a bash patch, but not this one ... bash32-025 has

Bash-3.2 Official Patch 25

2007-08-24 Thread Chet Ramey
BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 3.2 Patch-ID: bash32-025 Bug-Reported-by:Tom Bjorkholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-URL: