Re: Bash-3.2 Official Patch 20

2008-08-19 Thread Chet Ramey
BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 3.2 Patch-ID: bash32-020 Bug-Reported-by:Ian A Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-ID: OFEC551808.69D02C7F-ON8525729A.0045708D-8525729A.0046150 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bash-3.2 Official Patch 20

2007-08-26 Thread Chet Ramey
Mike Frysinger wrote: what i meant was that for some reason, i didnt get the readonly error after modifying one of those four values, but the script stopped parsing at the same spot since it was a readonly var ... (UID=1) -bash: UID: readonly variable (BASH_ARGV=; UID=1; echo HI) no

Re: Bash-3.2 Official Patch 20

2007-08-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 24 August 2007, Chet Ramey wrote: BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 3.2 Patch-ID: bash32-020 Bug-Reported-by: Ian A Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-Reference-ID:

Re: Bash-3.2 Official Patch 20

2007-08-25 Thread Chet Ramey
Mike Frysinger wrote: Bug-Description: In some cases of error processing, a jump back to the top-level processing loop from a builtin command would leave the shell in an inconsistent state. this appears to break handling of read only variables in source statements this may also just be a

Re: Bash-3.2 Official Patch 20

2007-08-25 Thread Chet Ramey
Mike Frysinger wrote: a side note ... if you change any of BASH_{ARGC,ARGV,LINENO,SOURCE} before setting a readonly variable, bash will not spit out the error message about the variable being readonly ... (UID=1) -bash: UID: readonly variable (BASH_ARGC= UID=1) no output this regression

Re: Bash-3.2 Official Patch 20

2007-08-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 25 August 2007, Chet Ramey wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: a side note ... if you change any of BASH_{ARGC,ARGV,LINENO,SOURCE} before setting a readonly variable, bash will not spit out the error message about the variable being readonly ... (UID=1) -bash: UID: readonly