Re: gprof not really looking at symbols attributes

2009-04-09 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Phil, When the same address is pointed to by many symbols, it seems gprof does everything to make the right choice for the symbol name to use ... except filling the Sym structure correctly. Here is a patch. Thanks - I have applied your patch along with this changelog entry. Cheers Nick

[Bug binutils/9909] Binutils strip/ar BFD internal error

2009-04-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-04-09 14:30 --- Created an attachment (id=3868) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3868action=view) Allow external symbols for the section comdat symbol --

[Bug binutils/9909] Binutils strip/ar BFD internal error

2009-04-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-04-09 14:32 --- Hi Claudius, You are using a slightly out of date version of binutils (2.18 as opposed to 2.19), but the bug is present in the current sources anyway. Please could you try out the uploaded patch which I

[Bug ld/7093] LD is unable to create reloacatable from binary

2009-04-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-04-09 14:45 --- Hi Soren, The patch is applied to the mainline code and will be present in the next release. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug gas/9856] generates illegal opcodes in unified mode instead of error

2009-04-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-04-09 15:00 --- Hi Bastian, This is not a bug. The assembler is quite reasonably translating the requested operation (move low register to low register whilst setting the status bits) into a machine instruction that will

[Bug ld/9824] Missing documentation for Linker Script Keywords

2009-04-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-04-09 16:04 --- Created an attachment (id=3869) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3869action=view) Document the ONLY_IF_RO, ONLY_IF_RW and CONSTANT linker script directives. --

[Bug ld/9824] Missing documentation for Linker Script Keywords

2009-04-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-04-09 16:05 --- Hi Rich, I am going to check in the uploaded patch to document these keywords. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ld/9824] Missing documentation for Linker Script Keywords

2009-04-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-09 16:07 --- Subject: Bug 9824 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-04-09 16:06:48 Modified files: ld : ChangeLog ld.texinfo Log message:

[Bug ld/7093] LD is unable to create reloacatable from binary

2009-04-09 Thread sgh at sgh dot dk
--- Additional Comments From sgh at sgh dot dk 2009-04-09 17:31 --- excellent, thanks :D -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7093 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.