[Bug ld/12801] ICE in bfd/elf64-x86-64.c line 2764 in elf64_x86_64_relocate_section

2011-05-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12801 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ld/12801] ICE in bfd/elf64-x86-64.c line 2764 in elf64_x86_64_relocate_section

2011-05-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12801 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW ---

[Bug gold/12804] New: Incremental link tests failed

2011-05-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12804 Summary: Incremental link tests failed Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo: i...@airs.com

[Bug gold/12804] Incremental link tests failed

2011-05-25 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12804 Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug binutils/12710] Relative paths in thin archives are incorrect in certain cases

2011-05-25 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12710 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com 2011-05-25 16:19:47 UTC --- Created attachment 5751 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5751 fix thin archive pathname appending -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug binutils/12710] Relative paths in thin archives are incorrect in certain cases

2011-05-25 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12710 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug ld/12801] ICE in bfd/elf64-x86-64.c line 2764 in elf64_x86_64_relocate_section

2011-05-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12801 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING ---

[Bug ld/12366] assertion failure with STT_GNU_IFUNC symbols on x86_64

2011-05-25 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12366 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-25 17:41:40 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Branch: binutils-2_21-branch Changes by:h...@sourceware.org2011-05-25 17:41:35

[Bug ld/12371] Garbage collection for STT_GNU_IFUNC symbols in shared library

2011-05-25 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-25 17:41:40 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Branch: binutils-2_21-branch Changes by:h...@sourceware.org2011-05-25 17:41:35

[Bug binutils/12558] AR move in an archive operation fails

2011-05-25 Thread d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12558 Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc

[Bug gold/12804] Incremental link tests failed

2011-05-25 Thread ccoutant at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12804 --- Comment #1 from Cary Coutant ccoutant at google dot com 2011-05-25 17:47:37 UTC --- Can you attach the file testsuite/test-suite.log? What version of gcc are you configured with? -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug gold/12559] GOLD cannot find entry symbol in a static library

2011-05-25 Thread d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12559 Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug gold/12804] Incremental link tests failed

2011-05-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12804 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-25 18:29:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Can you attach the file testsuite/test-suite.log? What version of gcc are you configured with? [hjl@gnu-6 gold]$ find -name *.log

[Bug gold/12804] Incremental link tests failed

2011-05-25 Thread ccoutant at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12804 --- Comment #3 from Cary Coutant ccoutant at google dot com 2011-05-25 19:01:19 UTC --- OK, I think the problem is that I'm out of patch space because some small COMDAT functions are being included incorrectly. COMDAT handling is incremental

[Bug binutils/12807] New: OBJCOPY from ELF to COFF changes relocation type from 32 to 16 bits

2011-05-25 Thread ee at la dot mine.nu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807 Summary: OBJCOPY from ELF to COFF changes relocation type from 32 to 16 bits Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

gold cannot handle _start in a library

2011-05-25 Thread Roland McGrath
Given: $ gcc -c -xc (echo '_start(){}') -o start.o $ ar cq libstart.a start.o $ ./gold/ld-new -o foo libstart.a The output file foo is an empty ELF file. With: $ ./gold/ld-new -o foo -e _start libstart.a ./gold/ld-new: warning: cannot find entry symbol

[Bug ld/12808] New: Segfault in _bfd_elf_merge_symbol

2011-05-25 Thread kmtaylor at gmx dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12808 Summary: Segfault in _bfd_elf_merge_symbol Product: binutils Version: 2.20 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo:

[Bug binutils/12710] Relative paths in thin archives are incorrect in certain cases

2011-05-25 Thread spoo at zarbosoft dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12710 --- Comment #3 from spoo at zarbosoft dot com 2011-05-26 02:39:56 UTC --- It works great! Thanks for looking at this. I tested it in the sandbox I used to test the original version and I tested it in my project. I don't know if there are

[Bug ld/12808] Segfault in _bfd_elf_merge_symbol

2011-05-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12808 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5752|application/octet-stream|text/plain

[Bug ld/12809] New: R_X86_64_TPOFF64 isn't handled properly

2011-05-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12809 Summary: R_X86_64_TPOFF64 isn't handled properly Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: