[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?

2008-04-04 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-04-04 11:46 --- Hi Vincent, I have now applied the patch along with a fix for the small problem that you noted. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?

2007-05-30 Thread vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr
--- Additional Comments From vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr 2007-05-30 21:41 --- My previous solution is not so good, because the main configure is run without the option igncr. And configure.in contains the line : baseargs=`cat conftestsed.out` Thus the generated Makefile

[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?

2007-05-28 Thread vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr
--- Additional Comments From vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr 2007-05-28 18:24 --- More ideas (again) : 6) libbfd_la_LIBADD = $(shell cat ofiles) @WIN32LIBADD@ This one works with every shell, but only with GNU Make.

Re: [Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?

2007-05-24 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Vincent, Sorry, it doesn't work. The filesystem is always considered in binmode. This is because you forgot the brackets in the awk regular expression ! I did ? Here is the fixed line : build_dir_mount_point=`df ${build_dir} | awk '/[0-9]%/{print $NF;}'` Hmm, that looks just like the

[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?

2007-05-24 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-05-24 10:14 --- Subject: Re: MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ? Hi Vincent, Sorry, it doesn't work. The filesystem is always considered in binmode. This is because you forgot the brackets in the awk

[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?

2007-05-24 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-05-24 10:23 --- Subject: Re: MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ? Nick Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Vincent, Sorry, it doesn't work. The filesystem is always considered in binmode. This is because you

[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?

2007-05-24 Thread dj at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From dj at redhat dot com 2007-05-24 16:49 --- IMHO the bug is that cygwin's bash isn't correctly stripping line endings while doing command substitution; it should always allow CR/LF at the end of `` substitutions, regardless of the mount mode. Also, it should

[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?

2007-05-23 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-05-23 13:39 --- Hi Vincent, Attached is a provisional patch that adds a check to the top level configure script to make sure that the build directory is mounted in binmode. Would you like to try it out ? I am not an

[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?

2007-05-22 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-05-22 10:43 --- Subject: Re: MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ? Hi Vincent, 5) libbfd_la_LIBADD = `expand ofiles` @WIN32LIBADD@ This one looks OK. (expand is a POSIX command, right ?) Have you tried it

[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?

2007-05-22 Thread vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr
--- Additional Comments From vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr 2007-05-22 20:46 --- Hi. Yes, the expand trick solves the problem described here. The last object file listed in ofiles is successfully added to libbfd.a Here is a small testcase showing the problem (and the solution)

[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?

2007-05-22 Thread vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr
--- Additional Comments From vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr 2007-05-22 20:57 --- Fixing this bug may not be a good idea, because the build fails later for another reason : gcc ... readelf.c ../bfd/bfd.h:103:3: #error No 64 bit integer type available There is also another bad

[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?

2007-05-19 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-05-19 14:49 --- None of the options are portable and supported by POSIX. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are

[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?

2007-05-19 Thread vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr
--- Additional Comments From vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr 2007-05-19 16:12 --- More ideas : 4) libbfd_la_LIBADD = `more ofiles` @WIN32LIBADD@ 5) libbfd_la_LIBADD = `expand ofiles` @WIN32LIBADD@ -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334 --- You are

[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?

2007-04-19 Thread willw at carallon dot com
--- Additional Comments From willw at carallon dot com 2007-04-19 16:48 --- I have seen exactly the same thing. Cygwin compiling 2.17 for powerpc/ I have investigated the bit in bfd/configure. Has two targets cpu-rs6000.lo cpu-powerpc.lo These both appear in the Makefile under the

[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?

2007-04-08 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-04-09 03:03 --- This is almost certainly something specific to your host, ie. you have a bug in your host cygwin tools. cpu-powerpc.lo is added to the objects that make up libbfd in bfd/configure. See the line starting