--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-03-11 15:27
---
Hi Niki,
Just one idea - have you tried building a static version of the 'ar' binary
and then testing that ?
Cheers
Nick
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=521
--- You are receiving
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-03-10 15:46
---
Hi Niki,
Sorry but I still cannot reproduce the problem. I checked both versions of
libmath.a that you uploaded and they both responded to the ar program, both with
the 't' command and the 'x' command.
If
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-03-10
16:10 ---
sure. just send it to my gmx addr given in Cc. i guess your version of ar will
work.
you may need to send me your libbfd-2.19.50.0.1.20081007.so lib also ...
===
$ ldd
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-03-09
11:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=3801)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3801action=view)
ar (2.19.51.0.2.20090204) / gcc error when bootstrapping gcc-4.3.3 on
i386-pc-solaris2.10
--
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-03-09
11:29 ---
now i get the same/similar? issue with binutils-2.19.51.0.2.20090204 on
i386-pc-solaris2.10. attached out2.bz2 which includes all output.
i will switch to binutils-2.19.50.0.1, and i bet gcc will bootstrap
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-03-09
11:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=3802)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3802action=view)
produced when bootstrapping gcc-4.3.3 on i386-pc-solaris2.10
last lines are:
===
/bin/bash ../libtool
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-03-09
11:51 ---
this looks interesting:
===
nwai...@amdsol-1:~ $ ar t libmath.a
stubs.o
signbit.o
signbitf.o
signbitl.o
nwai...@amdsol-1:~ $ ar x libmath.a
ar: libmath.a is not a valid archive
nwai...@amdsol-1:~ $ ar
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-03-09
13:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=3803)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3803action=view)
output of binutils-2.19.50.0.1.20081007 / gcc-4.3.3 bootstrap on
i386-pc-solaris2.10 (okay)
... as
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-03-09
13:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=3804)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3804action=view)
produced when bootstrapping gcc-4.3.3 on i386-pc-solaris2.10 using
binutils-2.19.50.0.1.20081007
this
--
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #3802|produced when bootstrapping |produced when bootstrapping
description|gcc-4.3.3 on i386-pc- |gcc-4.3.3 on i386-pc-
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-03-09
13:47 ---
strange:
===
nwai...@amdsol-1:~ $ /misc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/opt/binutils/2.19.51.0.2/bin/ar
-x libmath.a
/misc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/opt/binutils/2.19.51.0.2/bin/ar: libmath.a is not a
valid archive
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-02-18 11:14
---
Hi Niki,
Please could you provide a small testcase to reproduce the problem you are
having. I tried using the sequence of instructions originally described by
Bruno, but they worked. I also tried a few
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-01-27
15:46 ---
sort of same thing happens on sparc-sun-solaris2.10/binutils-2.19.51.0.1
it is impossible to compile libX11-1.1.92.2 and gcc-4.3.3 using
binutils-2.19.51.0.1. both tools compile fine when using
13 matches
Mail list logo
