--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-01-21 11:57
---
Hi Pierre,
Actually I can see no good reason for using this unsupported field, so I am
going to check in the attached patch to remove its use.
Cheers
Nick
bfd/ChangeLog
2009-01-21 Nick Clifton
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-21
11:58 ---
Subject: Bug 9769
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-01-21 11:58:05
Modified files:
bfd: ChangeLog vmsutil.c
Log message:
nickc at redhat dot com sourceware-bugzi...@sourceware.org writes:
Actually I can see no good reason for using this unsupported field, so I am
going to check in the attached patch to remove its use.
The result of localtime is now unused. Also, the use of st_mtim is
nonportable, too.
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2009-01-21 12:43 ---
Subject: Re: [Build failure] tm struct tm_gmtoff field build error
nickc at redhat dot com sourceware-bugzi...@sourceware.org writes:
Actually I can see no good reason for using this unsupported field, so I am
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-01-21 11:56
---
Created an attachment (id=3676)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3676action=view)
Remoev use of tm_gmtoff
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9769
--- You are receiving
--- Additional Comments From rupp at gnat dot com 2009-01-21 17:11 ---
Subject: Re: [Build failure] tm struct tm_gmtoff field
build error
nickc at redhat dot com wrote:
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-01-21 11:57
---
Hi Pierre,
Actually I
nickc at redhat dot com wrote:
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-01-21 11:57
---
Hi Pierre,
Actually I can see no good reason for using this unsupported field, so I am
going to check in the attached patch to remove its use.
The reason for the field was so
