[Bug gprof/7099] gprof documentation for linking with -lc_p is now misleading

2009-01-03 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-01-03 10:00 --- Hi Shlomi, -lc_p is only needed if you are invoking the linker directly. If you use gcc to drive the linker, then it is not needed. I will check the patch in along with this changelog entry. Cheers Nick

[Bug gprof/7099] gprof documentation for linking with -lc_p is now misleading

2009-01-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-03 10:01 --- Subject: Bug 7099 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-01-03 10:00:58 Modified files: gprof : ChangeLog gprof.texi Log message:

[Bug gprof/7099] gprof documentation for linking with -lc_p is now misleading

2009-01-02 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-01-02 19:17 --- Created an attachment (id=3632) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3632action=view) Add mention of using -static-libgcc -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7099 --- You

[Bug gprof/7099] gprof documentation for linking with -lc_p is now misleading

2009-01-02 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-01-02 19:18 --- Hi Shlomi, What do you think of the new paragraph in the uploaded patch ? Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug gprof/7099] gprof documentation for linking with -lc_p is now misleading

2009-01-02 Thread shlomif at iglu dot org dot il
--- Additional Comments From shlomif at iglu dot org dot il 2009-01-02 20:33 --- (In reply to comment #2) Hi Shlomi, Hi. What do you think of the new paragraph in the uploaded patch ? Well, you're missing an -lc_p in the command line . Otherwise, it looks OK. Regards, --