[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-12-23 12:28 --- Hi Micha, Sorry for the long delay in reviewing your latest patch. As it turns out it is fine (module a few formatting niggles) and so I have checked it in to the sources along with this ChangeLog entry.

Re: [Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

Hi Rainer, Did somebody else some tests using these binutils patches? Not yet, but I am back at my normal workplace now, so this is on my list. Is there a chance that these patches will be applied? Yup, in a couple of days probably. Sorry for the delay. Cheers Nick

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

--- Additional Comments From r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2005-12-21 16:32 --- FYI I build a toolchain using gcc-4.0.2 and binutils-2.16.1 patched with MIPS_OPTIONAL.patch and the binutils-2.16.1-elflink-optional-2.patch. gcc was configured with the following options:

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

--- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net 2005-11-23 21:32 --- Created an attachment (id=766) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=766action=view) generalise previous patch, depends on earlier MIPS-OPTIONAL patch Welcome back, Nick,

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-11-21 18:30 --- Subject: Re: undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init' Hi Michael, using the above test case I tracked down the place in elflink.c where the symbol os is reported as undefined when localed in a shared library.

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

--- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net 2005-11-13 17:41 --- Created an attachment (id=755) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=755action=view) new test case covering shared libraries containing optional symbols I've updated the test case

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

--- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net 2005-11-13 17:49 --- Created an attachment (id=756) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=756action=view) patch to make a mips-sgi-irix6.5 cross ld work for above test case The above test case works

Re: [Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

Hi Michael, The testcase nwo runs fine with the patched ld: Great - I will check that patch in then as a first step in resolving this PR. But the original problem with libpthread remains: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ gcc -o t t.o -lpthread /usr/lib/../lib64/libpthread.so: undefined reference

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-11-11 11:21 --- Subject: Re: undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init' Hi Michael, The testcase nwo runs fine with the patched ld: Great - I will check that patch in then as a first step in resolving this PR. But the

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-11-10 11:45 --- Subject: Re: undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init' Hi Michael, Okay, I gave it a try to build a testcase. It's included in the attachment. Thanks. I was not able to run all of the tests in your testcase,

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-11-10 12:51 --- Created an attachment (id=754) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=754action=view) Second attempt to handle OPTIONAL symbols -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 ---

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

--- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net 2005-11-10 18:57 --- The testcase nwo runs fine with the patched ld: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ot]$ make bu as -64 -o start.o start.s as -64 -o ot.o ot.s as -64 -o os.o os.s /usr/local/bin/ld

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-11-09 16:24 --- Subject: Re: undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init' Hi Michael, I don't have any information beyond the error message and what I learned from the message to the mailing list quoted above. The behaviour of

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-11-09 16:25 --- Created an attachment (id=752) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=752action=view) attempt to ignore OPTIONAL symbols -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 --- You are

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

--- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net 2005-11-09 21:29 --- Sorry, the attachment lost its name: it's a gzipped tarball (ot.tar.gz). -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on

Re: [Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

Hi Michael, I ran into this one as well on IRIX-6.5.28m with gcc-4.0.1 and binutils-2.16.1. Why is this bug in status WAITING? Is more input required? I can provide testing and debugging if required. Can you provide a specification for these OPTIONAL symbols ? Cheers Nick

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-11-08 15:04 --- Subject: Re: undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init' Hi Michael, I ran into this one as well on IRIX-6.5.28m with gcc-4.0.1 and binutils-2.16.1. Why is this bug in status WAITING? Is more input required? I

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

--- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net 2005-11-06 19:20 --- I ran into this one as well on IRIX-6.5.28m with gcc-4.0.1 and binutils-2.16.1. Why is this bug in status WAITING? Is more input required? I can provide testing and debugging if required. --

[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'

-- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---