--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-13
22:06 ---
I saw it on Linux/x86:
[...@gnu-6 9727]$ cat x.s
.section.text.foo,axG,@progbits,foo,comdat
.globl foo
.type foo,@function
foo:
.byte 0
.section
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-13
22:39 ---
We should check section groups to properly support ld -r --gc-sections:
1. If all sections in a section group are removed, we should also
remove the group section.
2. If any sections in a section group is
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-01-12 13:59
---
Hi Michael,
I could not reproduce this problem using the current mainline sources (for
both gcc and the binutils). Please could you try using them yourself and see if
you can make the bug occur. (Or else
--- Additional Comments From bruck dot michael at googlemail dot com
2009-01-12 15:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=3658)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3658action=view)
Compiled object file
This is the object file compiled with g++ 4.3.2
--
--- Additional Comments From bruck dot michael at googlemail dot com
2009-01-12 15:56 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I stumbled upon this with an binutils-2.19.51 (fetched on 2008-12-13). I went
back to 2.19 only for verification purposes.
I attached a an object file, please let me
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9727
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||bruck dot michael at
||googlemail dot com
