Hi Ralf,
The attached patches fix some typos, writing inconsistencies, and
punctuation issues in the various documentation bits of binutils and
subprojects.
Thanks very much for submitting these patches, I have applied them along
with the ChangeLog entries.
Cheers
Nick
I am trying to build a gdb (6.3) for the x86_64 host/target
for Solaris 2.10. BFD does not seem to support
x86_64 for Solaris. Is there a different target I could
use to configure bfd which would also work on solaris?
Thanks,
-Tucker Taft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-07-24 16:30
---
Hi Lior,
Please accept my apologese for taking so long to get back to you on this
problem. I have now tried your test case - it does indeed reproduce the
problem, and the patch is acceptable, so I have applied
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-07-24 16:48
---
Hi Martin,
Sorry for the long delay in responding - work has been really hectic recently.
Anyway, I am glad that the patch is workign for you as well. I will check it
in to the sources so that it does not
Hi Zippel,
Until at least 2.15 as accepted a macro like this:
.macro foo size,arg,arg2
move\size \arg,\arg2
.endm
foo.l %d0,%d1
Another alternative is to restore the old behaviour, which only accepts
alphanumeric characters and '_'/'$'.
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-07-24 17:01
---
Subject: Re: New: macro name syntax changed
Hi Zippel,
Until at least 2.15 as accepted a macro like this:
.macro foo size,arg,arg2
move\size \arg,\arg2
.endm
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2848
--- You are receiving this mail because:
