[Bug gas/3054] unknown architecture `ep9312'

2006-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-08 08:16 --- Hi Mark, GCC build with --with-cpu=ep9312 works fine with binutils. Your argument is clear to me, but what do the gcc guys think about that? Well since Richard Earnshaw is both the gcc ARM maintainer and the

[Bug binutils/3186] New: symbol `.debug_abbrev' required but not present

2006-09-08 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
$ cat tmp.cpp #include cstdio void foo() { } $ g++ -O1 -gdwarf-2 -g2 -feliminate-dwarf2-dups tmp.cpp -c --save-temps $ strip --strip-debug tmp.o BFD: st0P202e: symbol `.debug_abbrev' required but not present strip: st0P202e: No symbols -- Summary: symbol `.debug_abbrev' required but

[Bug binutils/3110] unsupported relocation type {R_SPARC_H44, R_SPARC_WDISP30, R_SPARC_64}

2006-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-08 15:07 --- Hi Pawel, The real problem here appears to be that the libraries you are stripping contain object files of different target types (elf64-big and elf64-sparc). Objcopy was assuming that you wanted to convert

[Bug binutils/3110] unsupported relocation type {R_SPARC_H44, R_SPARC_WDISP30, R_SPARC_64}

2006-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-08 15:08 --- Created an attachment (id=1290) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1290action=view) Preserve output file formats of copied archive elements unless explicitly requiested otherwise --

[Bug gas/3129] Document use of \() in .macro

2006-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-08 16:23 --- Created an attachment (id=1291) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1291action=view) Improve macro documentation -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3129 --- You are

[Bug gas/3129] Document use of \() in .macro

2006-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-08 16:24 --- Hi Markus, I have applied the upload patch to improve the documenation in the way that you suggested. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added