[Bug admin/12094] Errors found while checking this document as HTML 4.01 Transitional!

2010-10-05 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12094 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2010-10-05 16:23:36 UTC --- It causes real display bugs. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because

[Bug admin/12094] Errors found while checking this document as HTML 4.01 Transitional!

2010-10-05 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12094 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2010-10-05 16:54:20 UTC --- Status: UNCONFIRMED (edit) [ ] Add me to CC list Product: [binutils

[Bug admin/12094] Errors found while checking this document as HTML 4.01 Transitional!

2010-10-05 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12094 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2010-10-05 17:47:06 UTC --- This _is_ the screenshot. [All] and -- are not supposed to be there. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Bug gas/12157] m68k statement ignored syntax error when @TLSLDO+4(%a0)

2010-10-24 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12157 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/12058] ar s command undocumented

2010-10-28 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12058 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug binutils/12058] ar s command undocumented

2010-10-29 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12058 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2010-10-29 09:51:07 UTC --- Why didn't I see your patches on the binutils list? -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

[Bug gas/12180] gas: -mfido doesn't accept floating point instructions

2010-11-03 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2010-11-03 08:40:08 UTC --- You are using the wrong target. m68k-linux is only compatible with m68k-linux. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Bug ld/12327] x86 relocatable kernel is broken

2010-12-16 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12327 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2010-12-16 17:26:44 UTC --- The obvious fix is to move the symbol in a section. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

[Bug ld/12451] --build-id regression

2011-01-28 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12451 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-01-28 15:50:24 UTC --- See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472152 for the original bug report and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501582 for a follow-up bug

[Bug gas/6957] i386 NOPs must be derived from march not mtune

2011-02-08 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6957 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug ld/12478] discrepancy between 'ld.1' file and 'configure'

2011-02-11 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12478 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug ld/12478] discrepancy between 'ld.1' file and 'configure'

2011-02-11 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12478 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug ld/12478] discrepancy between 'ld.1' file and 'configure'

2011-02-11 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12478 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug ld/12480] 'ld' does not show command line arguments despite of '--verbose'

2011-02-11 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12480 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING

[Bug ld/12478] discrepancy between 'ld.1' file and 'configure'

2011-02-11 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12478 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug ld/12480] 'ld' does not show command line arguments despite of '--verbose'

2011-02-11 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12480 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/12516] New: BFD: The first section in the PT_DYNAMIC segment is not the .dynamic section

2011-02-24 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassig...@sources.redhat.com ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: amo...@gmail.com $ cat dynamic.s .section .data1,aw .balign 16 $ cat dynamic.ld SECTIONS { . = SIZEOF_HEADERS; .text : { *(.text) } .data

[Bug binutils/12516] BFD: The first section in the PT_DYNAMIC segment is not the .dynamic section

2011-02-25 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-02-25 10:18:05 UTC --- The linker is red herring, this is all about objcopy. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

[Bug ld/12669] Suspected bug in calculation of gp-relative offsets for ia64 target

2011-04-13 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12669 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-04-13 13:55:02 UTC --- Note that the linker does not always put gp at the start of the .got section. If you want to force a particular gp value you need to define the symbol __gp

[Bug ld/12669] Suspected bug in calculation of gp-relative offsets for ia64 target

2011-04-13 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12669 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ld/12808] Segfault in _bfd_elf_merge_symbol

2011-05-26 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12808 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/13125] readelf exits 0 when DWARF information requested but none present

2011-08-24 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13125 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-08-24 07:07:04 UTC --- I don't see it as an error when a DWARF section does not exist. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Bug gas/13145] movem zero offset not removed on ColdFire

2011-09-01 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13145 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-09-01 16:11:54 UTC --- There is currently no specifier that matches modes 2+5, so the patterns are separate. /* FIXME: need specifier for mode 2 and 5 to simplify below insn

[Bug gas/13145] movem zero offset not removed on ColdFire

2011-09-01 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13145 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-09-01 16:19:06 UTC --- Actually there is: y(modes 2,5) But the FIXME is older. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab

[Bug gas/13145] movem zero offset not removed on ColdFire

2011-09-10 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13145 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ld/13470] ld's powerpc32 relocation/dynsym output changed in many bad ways with 2.22 (e.g. textrel added)

2011-12-02 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13470 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sch...@linux

[Bug ld/13470] ld's powerpc32 relocation/dynsym output changed in many bad ways with 2.22 (e.g. textrel added)

2011-12-02 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13470 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|ppc/ppc32, possibly also|powerpc

[Bug binutils/13891] Binutils is impossible to static link due to broken libtool behavior

2012-03-22 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13891 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-03-22 08:27:47 UTC --- Just don't use --enable-shared. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because

[Bug binutils/13891] Binutils is impossible to static link due to broken libtool behavior

2012-03-22 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13891 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-03-22 08:52:57 UTC --- Please ignore the last comment, I misread. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Bug gas/14066] nopw istruction return signal 4 - Illegal instruction- on cpu VIA Nehemiah

2012-05-07 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14066 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libc|gas

[Bug binutils/14088] Strange addend from readelf

2012-05-10 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14088 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-05-10 08:00:19 UTC --- Displaying it as a decimal number would be much less useful. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Bug binutils/14416] .eh_frame section not copied correctly by --only-keep-debug

2012-07-29 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14416 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-07-29 11:56:31 UTC --- .eh_frame is not a debug section. It is a loaded section so it will never be stripped from the original object. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org

[Bug binutils/14416] .eh_frame section not copied correctly by --only-keep-debug

2012-07-29 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14416 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-07-29 13:10:21 UTC --- .eh_frame is handled like all other non-debug sections. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Bug binutils/14541] Wrong entry point computation using cross binutils linux amd64-arm-linux-gnueabihf

2012-09-03 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14541 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-09-03 08:57:17 UTC --- How did you configure it? -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because

[Bug ld/14718] ld crashes on ARMv5 due to unaligned memory access

2012-10-14 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14718 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-10-14 17:08:37 UTC --- Why is objalloc_alloc returning unaligned memory? -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Bug ld/14718] ld crashes on ARMv5 due to unaligned memory access

2012-10-14 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14718 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-10-14 20:34:17 UTC --- You cannot pass a pointer for an integral argument. How did you manage to suppress the warning? It'll be simpler to just allocate each array

[Bug binutils/14663] strip --only-keep-debug doesn't remove .text, etc.

2012-10-26 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14663 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-10-26 22:30:05 UTC --- It already says it: `--only-keep-debug' Strip a file, removing contents of any sections that would

[Bug binutils/14875] Disassembling m68k shows scales which the m68000 does not support

2012-11-25 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14875 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-11-25 14:29:33 UTC --- That's not Memory Indirect Preindexed (the 68000 does not support memory indirect at all) but Address Register Indirect with Index (8-Bit Displacement). Just

[Bug admin/12094] Errors found while checking this document as HTML 4.01 Transitional!

2012-12-03 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12094 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug gas/15393] .string with hex should be parsed differently

2013-04-24 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15393 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-04-24 10:03:39 UTC --- This is consistent with the C string parsing rules and matches the documentation. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab

[Bug gas/15602] .word L2-L1 fails to diagnose offsets larger than 16 bits, resulting in broken jump tables on m68k

2013-06-11 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15602 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- The problem is that the jump table itself is bigger than 32K, which is not handled by BROKEN_DOT_WORD. All entries are supposed to be pointing to 20008. -- You are receiving

[Bug gas/15602] .word L2-L1 fails to diagnose offsets larger than 16 bits, resulting in broken jump tables on m68k

2013-06-12 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15602 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- In the real world the offset is signed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/15728] binutils fails to build with clang and --enable-targets=all on Mac OS

2013-07-18 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15728 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- extern is implict for function decarations. The problem are the inline definitions, which assume -fgnu89-inline. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug binutils/15818] objdump does not work with /proc/kcore

2013-08-12 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15818 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/14768] Checklist: Binutils Migration To Git

2013-08-20 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14768 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- There should be an empty line after the subject line. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug binutils/15920] bfd.h not suitable as a general-purpose header

2013-09-02 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15920 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- libbfd is not a general-purpose library, but intented to be embedded into the sources of the consuming applications (like GDB and binutils). -- You are receiving this mail because

[Bug binutils/15920] bfd.h not suitable as a general-purpose header

2013-09-02 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15920 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- BFD has no ABI nor API stability. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing

[Bug binutils/16252] New: readelf -wF mishandles DW_CFA_restore_state

2013-11-26 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org readelf -wF loses the state of the saved registers after DW_CFA_restore_state. $ readelf -wf nptl/pthread_cond_timedwait.os Contents of the .eh_frame section: 001c CIE Version

[Bug binutils/16318] New: Objcopy loses EI_OSABI

2013-12-11 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: matz at suse dot de Of all the ELF bfd targets only elf32-arm and elfnn-aarch64 copy over the EI_OSABI field in a bfd_copy_private_bfd_data hook. It should either be recomputed or copied generically

[Bug binutils/14289] bfd_pef_xlib_read_header reads beyond array bounds

2013-12-25 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14289 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|bfd_pef_xlib_read_header

[Bug binutils/16373] new option -o for objdump

2013-12-27 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16373 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- How is adding the -o option not a kludge? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/16395] Can't get address、filenameline number on aix 6.1 by addr2line

2014-01-05 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16395 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https

[Bug binutils/16395] Can't get address、filenameline number on aix 6.1 by addr2line

2014-01-05 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16395 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/16396] Can't get address、filename、line number on aix 6.1 by addr2line!

2014-01-05 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16396 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- *** Bug 16395 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug ld/16403] New: Spurious undefined reference with --as-needed

2014-01-07 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: matz at suse dot de Target: i386-*-* Created attachment 7339 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7339action=edit Linker test case $ ld --build-id --eh

[Bug ld/16403] Spurious undefined reference with --as-needed

2014-02-03 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16403 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- IMHO the behaviour of GROUP should not depend on --as-needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug binutils/16528] Binutils fails to build with CONFIG_SHELL=dash

2014-02-05 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16528 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/16856] avr-size missing avr format option and mcu option

2014-04-19 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16856 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug gas/16931] FTBFS in gas/config/tc-m68k.c with gcc 4.9

2014-05-11 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16931 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/17169] argument list too long error

2014-07-17 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17169 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- This is most likely a qemu problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils

[Bug ld/17324] ld -r not generate cantunwind records in .ARM.exidx section

2014-09-10 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/17419] build failure: bfd.texinfo has missing node references

2014-09-21 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17419 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug binutils/17483] ar is limited to open only 256 files on i386-solaris2.11

2014-10-14 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17483 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Please make sure this limit isn't imposed by stdio on your system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug binutils/17510] strings: crash when given a truncated ELF

2014-10-27 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17510 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- This should fix it: diff --git a/bfd/srec.c b/bfd/srec.c index 9ed2080..0c473b2 100644 --- a/bfd/srec.c +++ b/bfd/srec.c @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ srec_scan (bfd *abfd) case 'S

[Bug ld/17558] ld will follow DT_NEEDED when it is not necessary

2014-11-05 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17558 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ld/17742] New: ABI version 1 is not compatible with ABI version 0 output

2014-12-22 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target: powerpc64-*-* $ echo 'int x;' foo.c $ gcc -shared -o foo.so foo.c $ gcc -c foo.c $ readelf -h foo.o | grep Flags: Flags

[Bug ld/17742] ABI version 1 is not compatible with ABI version 0 output

2014-12-22 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17742 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail

[Bug ld/17742] ABI version 1 is not compatible with ABI version 0 output

2014-12-23 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17742 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at suse

[Bug ld/17742] ABI version 1 is not compatible with ABI version 0 output

2014-12-24 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17742 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- $ ld -shared --eh-frame-hdr --as-needed foo.o foo.so ld: foo.so: ABI version 1 is not compatible with ABI version 0 output ld: failed to merge target specific data of file foo.so

[Bug binutils/17767] Multiple (8) buffer overruns due to incorrect value

2014-12-28 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17767 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- pe.h also redefines E_FILNMLEN. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing

[Bug binutils/17914] Correct typos in cpu-w65.c license notice.

2015-02-02 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17914 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- A clbuttic mistake. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug

[Bug gold/17954] error: hidden symbol '...' is not defined locally

2015-02-10 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17954 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenther

[Bug gold/17954] New: error: hidden symbol '...' is not defined locally

2015-02-10 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
: gold Assignee: ccoutant at google dot com Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: ian at airs dot com Target: powerpc64-*-* Created attachment 8117 -- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8117action=edit libsystemd_la-catalog.o $ gold/ld

[Bug gold/17954] error: hidden symbol '...' is not defined locally

2015-02-18 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17954 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail

[Bug gas/17877] bad opcodes for coldfire m5307

2015-01-26 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17877 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ld/17800] regression -l:path/lib.so

2015-01-05 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17800 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ld/17606] -l:/absolute/path/to/lib.so broken

2015-01-05 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17606 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sourceware

[Bug gas/18108] possible coldfire gas bug on frame pointer

2015-03-15 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18108 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug gas/18108] possible coldfire gas bug on frame pointer

2015-03-13 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18108 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Which part of the file is mishandled by the assembler? What is the assembler command line? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug gas/18108] possible coldfire gas bug on frame pointer

2015-03-10 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18108 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug ld/17606] -l:/absolute/path/to/lib.so broken

2015-03-27 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17606 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||4xrsJCr9

[Bug ld/18172] --library with NAMESPEC of the form :FILENAME returns an error

2015-03-27 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18172 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ld/18344] ld emits unnecessary line breaks that pollute the output of compilers.

2015-04-28 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18344 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug ld/18354] New: FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output

2015-04-29 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: x86_64-* tmpdir/normal.out tmpdir/gnunormal.out differ. FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug

[Bug ld/18354] FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output

2015-04-29 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18354 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug ld/18354] FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output

2015-04-29 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18354 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug ld/18344] ld emits unnecessary line breaks that pollute the output of compilers.

2015-04-28 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18344 --- Comment #23 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- They are handled by the same state. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils

[Bug ld/18354] FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output

2015-04-29 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18354 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug ld/18354] FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output

2015-04-29 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18354 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug ld/18354] FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output

2015-04-29 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18354 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- @@ -1,180 +1,175 @@ -ld/tmpdir/gnunormal: file format elf64-x86-64 +ld/tmpdir/normal: file format elf64-x86-64 Disassembly of section .init: -004004d8 _init

[Bug ld/18354] FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output

2015-04-29 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18354 --- Comment #14 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- All tests PASS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils

[Bug gas/18599] Use .strtab section for section names in ELF object files

2015-06-25 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18599 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- You can save much more by stripping the object. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug

[Bug binutils/19222] Undefined behavoour in tc-arm.c:encode_arm_immediate with Xcode 7.1

2015-11-10 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19222 Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RE

[Bug gold/19200] error: unrecognised output emulation: aarch64linux

2015-11-03 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19200 Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl

[Bug gold/19119] Gold accepts bogus target emulation

2015-11-04 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19119 Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|

[Bug gold/19172] gold is missing emulations, at least on aarch64-linux, arm-linux-gnueabi, powerpc-linux

2015-11-04 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19172 Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|

[Bug gold/19200] New: error: unrecognised output emulation: aarch64linux

2015-11-02 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
Component: gold Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: ian at airs dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: aarch64-*-* $ make check-gold [...] `echo g++ -W -Wall-Werror -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64

[Bug gold/19200] error: unrecognised output emulation: aarch64linux

2015-11-02 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19200 Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|

[Bug gold/19119] Gold accepts bogus target emulation

2015-11-02 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19119 Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|

[Bug gas/19109] Cannot configure default flag_compress_debug

2015-10-12 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19109 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> --- I'd expect the option's default to be os-dependent, not arch-dependent. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for t

  1   2   3   4   >