https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587
--- Comment #14 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=71d3dc74309599cd9bbdfa17dcfdfd8c406a1093
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587
Szabolcs Nagy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nszabolcs at gmail dot com
---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at sourceware dot org
---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587
--- Comment #11 from parakleta at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to cvs-com...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #4)
> The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
>
> https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587
--- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=63442f6a2eff9f4c5c67099565f59c0f135aff94
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587
--- Comment #8 from parakleta at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to parakleta from comment #7)
> I've just realised that changing the order of rules may not work.
Ignore this. There is an explicit dependency on the "BUILT_SOURCES" existing
which
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587
--- Comment #7 from parakleta at gmail dot com ---
I've just realised that changing the order of rules may not work.
We want to have '.m -> .c -> .o' as the sequence without triggering '.m -> .o',
and by setting '.c' before '.m' we're saying
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587
--- Comment #6 from parakleta at gmail dot com ---
Sorry, by suffix rule order this means the order of suffixes in the
`.SUFFIXES:` target which is autogenerated by the `SUFFIXES` variable in the
"makefile.am" file. Your change will attempt to
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=415ed2a17588f855397cc2d03aa68a79e84f77f7
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587
parakleta at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||parakleta at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-04-25 16:22
---
Subject: Re: New: Failed to build gprof under gmake patched
by Apple.
Hi Masaki,
Building gprof was failed because of patched gmake (bundled with OSX).
Follow is a patch to disable a builtin suffix rule.
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-04-25 16:23
---
Patch applied
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
15 matches
Mail list logo
