Re: Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-07 Thread nick clifton
Hi Patrice, Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and errors. In my opinion, it falls in the 'minor changes' case with respect to copyright. Thanks. I have applied your patch along with these changelog entries. Cheers Nick bfd/doc/ChangeLog 2013-01-07

Re: Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-07 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 12:09:29PM +, nick clifton wrote: Hi Patrice, Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and errors. In my opinion, it falls in the 'minor changes' case with respect to copyright. Thanks. I have applied your patch along with these

Re: Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-04 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 11:34:26PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: HI Karl, hi all, I just came back from Paris, so I cannot provide more details now, but it seems that binutils has a problem with the .92 pretest: From the build error log (excerpt)

Re: Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-04 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Patrice, Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and errors. Core of the patch is s/itemx/item/ right? Everything else seems to be unrelated changes. Norbert ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org

Re: Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-04 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 10:27:52AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: Hi Patrice, Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and errors. Core of the patch is s/itemx/item/ right? Everything else seems to be unrelated changes. The patch handles errors/warnings