Re: 'csplit' core dumps in 'make check'

2003-11-16 Thread Jim Meyering
[coreutils-5.0 `make check' problems with csplit and dd on HPUX]

Thanks for the reports.
Would you please try the latest test release?

BETA
  ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-5.0.91.tar.gz
  ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-5.0.91.tar.bz2


___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils


Re: 'csplit' core dumps in 'make check'

2003-11-16 Thread Jim Meyering
Oh.  I see from your config.log (55k lines!) that you were using
this sort of system:

  hostname = w408lynx
  uname -m = 9000/778
  uname -r = B.10.20
  uname -s = HP-UX
  uname -v = A

If you send a big attachment like that again, please compress it first.


___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils


RE: 'csplit' core dumps in 'make check'

2003-11-15 Thread Mark_Conty
Hello, again --

Once I commented out csplit from the list of TESTS in 
tests/misc/Makefile, the make check progressed further, only to 
encounter another error, this time in tests/rm/:

out exp differ: char 26, line 1
1c1
 rm: cannot remove `a/b': Permission denied
---
 rm: cannot remove `a/b': Operation not permitted
FAIL: fail-2eperm

I commented out rm from the list of SUBDIRS in tests/Makefile, and ran 
make check again, this time hitting a series of Memory fault 
(coredump) errors in /tac/.  I've attached the output (tac.txt), 
produced with VERBOSE=yes.

Continuing from that point, I only ran into one more failure, this time 
in /tail-2/, where the 'dd' command -- neither the default HP-UX 
/usr/bin/dd nor /opt/gnu/bin/dd, version 3.16 from GNU fileutils -- 
couldn't handle the large 4gb parameter.  I don't know if this falls 
into one of those framework errors mentioned in the README, but I was 
running as root, so I don't think any kind of setuid/setgid change 
would have made any difference.  No further make check failures after 
that point.

See ya!
-- 
Mark Conty
Cargill, Inc.
Corporate I/T Services
No suffix list.
make  check-TESTS
No suffix list.
testing program: ../../src/tac
tac (coreutils) 5.0
Written by Jay Lepreau and David MacKenzie.

Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
passed basic-0(F)
passed basic-0(|)
passed basic-0()
passed basic-b(F)
passed basic-b(|)
passed basic-b()
passed basic-c(F)
passed basic-c(|)
passed basic-c()
passed basic-e(F)
passed basic-e(|)
passed basic-e()
passed basic-f(F)
passed basic-f(|)
passed basic-f()
passed basic-g(F)
passed basic-g(|)
passed basic-g()
passed basic-h(F)
passed basic-h(|)
passed basic-h()
passed basic-i(F)
passed basic-i(|)
passed basic-i()
passed basic-j(F)
passed basic-j(|)
passed basic-j()
passed basic-k(F)
passed basic-k(|)
passed basic-k()
passed opt-b(F)
passed opt-b(|)
passed opt-b()
passed opt-s(F)
passed opt-s(|)
passed opt-s()
passed opt-sb(F)
passed opt-sb(|)
passed opt-sb()
./tac-tests[723]: 7422 Memory fault(coredump)
Test opt-r(F) failed: ../../src/tac return code 139 differs from expected value 0
./tac-tests[741]: 7426 Memory fault(coredump)
Test opt-r(|) failed: ../../src/tac return code 139 differs from expected value 0
./tac-tests[759]: 7429 Memory fault(coredump)
Test opt-r() failed: ../../src/tac return code 139 differs from expected value 0
./tac-tests[777]: 7432 Memory fault(coredump)
Test opt-r2(F) failed: ../../src/tac return code 139 differs from expected value 0
./tac-tests[795]: 7436 Memory fault(coredump)
Test opt-r2(|) failed: ../../src/tac return code 139 differs from expected value 0
./tac-tests[813]: 7442 Memory fault(coredump)
Test opt-r2() failed: ../../src/tac return code 139 differs from expected value 0
./tac-tests[831]: 7445 Memory fault(coredump)
Test opt-br(F) failed: ../../src/tac return code 139 differs from expected value 0
./tac-tests[849]: 7449 Memory fault(coredump)
Test opt-br(|) failed: ../../src/tac return code 139 differs from expected value 0
./tac-tests[867]: 7452 Memory fault(coredump)
Test opt-br() failed: ../../src/tac return code 139 differs from expected value 0
./tac-tests[885]: 7455 Memory fault(coredump)
Test opt-br2(F) failed: ../../src/tac return code 139 differs from expected value 0
./tac-tests[903]: 7459 Memory fault(coredump)
Test opt-br2(|) failed: ../../src/tac return code 139 differs from expected value 0
./tac-tests[921]: 7462 Memory fault(coredump)
Test opt-br2() failed: ../../src/tac return code 139 differs from expected value 0
Failed 12 tests.
FAIL: tac-tests
==
1 of 1 tests failed
Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
*** Error exit code 1

Stop.
*** Error exit code 1

Stop.
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils


RE: 'csplit' core dumps in 'make check'

2003-11-15 Thread Mark_Conty
 Continuing from that point, I only ran into one more failure, 
 this time in /tail-2/, where the 'dd' command -- neither the 
 default HP-UX /usr/bin/dd nor /opt/gnu/bin/dd, version 3.16 
 from GNU fileutils -- couldn't handle the large 4gb 
 parameter.

I also ran make check once more, this time using the dd binary built 
in /coreutils-5.0/, but that one complained about the over-large 
parameter, too:

Making check in tail-2
No suffix list.
make  check-TESTS
No suffix list.
/src/gnu/coreutils-5.0/src/dd: advancing past 4294967288 bytes in 
output file `big': Invalid argument
./big-4gb: failure in testing framework
FAIL: big-4gb

See ya...
-- Mark



___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils