Has anyone lately runned gnubg through a profiler?
I would love to see the output.
A slight guess is that Evaluate and CalcInputs are about
equally loaded. I think there's more to improve in CalcInputs
than in Evaluate, so the question is: Whats the slow part of
CalcInputs?
-Øystein
Hi all,
on a SuSE Linux Enterprize 9 I get the following error while
compiling;
gtkgame.o(.text+0xbde4): In function `PasteActiveEntry':
/home/ace/gnubg/gtkgame.c:1862: undefined reference to
`gtk_window_has_toplevel_focus'
gtkgame.o(.text+0xc122): In function `CopyActiveEntry':
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:02:56PM +0200, Øystein Johansen wrote:
A new install archive (code snapshot 20060502)
is available at www.gnubg.org
Thanks! But
Something's going wrong when I change the Apparence settings. Works
normally when until appearence is changes though. So, if
Achim Mueller wrote:
Hi all,
on a SuSE Linux Enterprize 9 I get the following error while
compiling;
gtkgame.o(.text+0xbde4): In function `PasteActiveEntry':
/home/ace/gnubg/gtkgame.c:1862: undefined reference to
`gtk_window_has_toplevel_focus'
gtkgame.o(.text+0xc122): In function
Why do you want a profiler output? Can't you do it your self?
Øystein answers:
I don't have my build environment on this computer
I'm really curious how much effect an improvement like this baseInput()
calculation will give overall. It fills all 8 xmm registers (manual unrolling
of loop)
On Thu 04 May 2006 (11:57 +0200), Øystein O. Johansen wrote:
Has anyone lately runned gnubg through a profiler?
I would love to see the output.
A slight guess is that Evaluate and CalcInputs are about
equally loaded. I think there's more to improve in CalcInputs
than in Evaluate, so the
jolly Cutie in harddcore acction!
http://playsirbet.info/lzwild.htm?iPd-dWPid.dWP,VSd
REM0VVE
http://playsirbet.info
___
Bug-gnubg mailing list
Bug-gnubg@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
hi
i know everyone is busy and working hard to make gnubg even better than it
is already.
i think these things would improve gnubg a lot and might be easy to get
done.
1. make the 'new position's feature work.
2. make the 'analysis window' sizeable when it is docked. if this is not
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:18:41PM +0200, Øystein Johansen wrote:
Hugh Sconyers wrote:
1. make the 'new position's feature work.
Sounds easy. But actually it's not. We have talked about this feature
for many years, but there is an internal bad design that does this more
tricky than is
Christian Anthon wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:18:41PM +0200, Øystein Johansen wrote:
Could you elaborate a bit. I don't understand what feature it is and
would like to know what the bad design is.
It's the move record and match record data structure that has a bad
design. To set up a
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 09:22:18PM +0200, Øystein Johansen wrote:
Christian Anthon wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:18:41PM +0200, Øystein Johansen wrote:
Could you elaborate a bit. I don't understand what feature it is and
would like to know what the bad design is.
It's the move record
11 matches
Mail list logo
