Douglas Zare wrote on 07 July 2006 22:32
I've contributed many ideas to gnubg, but I'd like to ask
that you not start working on this idea of mine before the
end of 2006. I'm pretty confident that this idea was not in the air.
I think this is a reasonable request, and I don't think it
Christian Athon wrote :
Yes, and likely zbot will have an advantage here, since from what I
have read, the zbot net is developed to be more human like, that is,
you can ask questions do you understand this position, is it
volatile...
That's an exemple of the fact that different people may have
On 7/9/06, Joseph Heled [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I may be
wrong but offhand I can't remember any of Douglas ideas that were
eventually implemented in gnubg.
That may be because, as I complained before, people have done a poor
job of attributing ideas. See
On 7/11/06, Douglas Zare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/9/06, Joseph Heled [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I may be
wrong but offhand I can't remember any of Douglas ideas that were
eventually implemented in gnubg.
Well, I am sorry I was not more precise. I meant of course implemented
by me, since
Joseph Heled wrote:
Personally, I think bot personality is very hard to pull off, and I
would be very much interested to finally see zbot in action, even
without any personality.
That's where my post was coming in. For decades now the industry has
worked to bring personalities to these
On 7/7/06, Jonathan Kinsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do people think about altering gnubg play depending on some kind of
personality setting?
Ps. I think I saw this in a comment about the
upcoming zbot backgammon program.
Offhand, it sounds hard to make it work well. :) I think I've done
On 7/7/06, Jonathan Kinsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do people think about altering gnubg play depending on some kind of
personality setting?
gnubg having a personality is secondary to me, but I would like to
have some knobs to turn, both for chequer play and cube evaluations.
What I can
On 7/7/06, Douglas Zare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/7/06, Jonathan Kinsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do people think about altering gnubg play depending on some kind of
personality setting?
Ps. I think I saw this in a comment about the
upcoming zbot backgammon program.
Offhand, it
On 7/7/06, Douglas Zare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've contributed many ideas to gnubg, but I'd like to ask that you not
start working on this idea of mine before the end of 2006. I'm pretty
confident that this idea was not in the air.
Well, to quote from zbots homepage,
Welcome to the home
On 7/7/06, Christian Anthon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/7/06, Douglas Zare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've contributed many ideas to gnubg, but I'd like to ask that you not
start working on this idea of mine before the end of 2006. I'm pretty
confident that this idea was not in the air.
Douglas Zare wrote:
I'd like to ask that you not start working on this idea of mine
before the end of 2006. I'm pretty confident that this idea was
not in the air.
That's entirely wrong - I've thought of exactly this idea for a long
time before I even started playing backgammon! i.e. How to
11 matches
Mail list logo
