Re: [PATCH] conditions variables module

2008-08-11 Thread James Youngman
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Yoann Vandoorselaere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The supposed way to use pthread_atfork is that the prepare fork handler will be called prior to the process forking so that the application can lock the program to solidify it in a known state. Yes, my point is that

test-c-stack and C89 [was: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12]

2008-08-11 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Alain Guibert on 8/8/2008 4:13 AM: Hello, Alain, I'll reply to different issues with different subject lines, to make it easier to track. | | gcc -I. -I../lib -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -I../lib -I./../lib -g -O2 -c test-c-stack.c | |

Re: os/2 child process status [was: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12]

2008-08-11 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Eric Blake on 8/10/2008 10:26 PM: | | Checking ./182.mkstemp | ... | | -1 | | +256 | | Testsuite bug; I'll have to patch doc/m4.texinfo. Basically, I cannot | assume that a failed 'test -f foo-*' exits with status 1, only that it |

Re: os/2 c-stack [was: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12]

2008-08-11 Thread Elbert Pol
Hi Eric, To be onnest i have never use any debugging tool or whatever. And i will see how far i come with the libsigsegv Eric Blake wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Elbert Pol on 8/7/2008 12:09 PM: | | But with the make -k check there are some errors. | | I

Re: os/2 c-stack [was: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12]

2008-08-11 Thread Elbert Pol
Hello Eric, i build Libsigsegv But with make check i get Making check in src make.exe[1]: Entering directory `U:/libsigsegv-2.5/src' make.exe[1]: Nothing to be done for `check'. make.exe[1]: Leaving directory `U:/libsigsegv-2.5/src' Making check in tests make.exe[1]: Entering directory

Re: os/2 c-stack [was: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12]

2008-08-11 Thread Elbert Pol
Hoi Eric, I build now with Libsigsegv I attach the logs Also, it looks like you built without libsigsegv installed. Would you be willing to download libsigsegv (2.5 is the latest release, although there are some patches in CVS that have not yet been released, necessary for correct operation

Re: os/2 c-stack [was: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12]

2008-08-11 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Elbert, i386-pc-os2-emx | no | no | 2.5 This line simply means that libsigsegv has no support for EMX. This is only going to change if someone familiar with the EMX API and with a debugger on that platform is doing the porting work. Bruno

Re: os/2 c-stack [was: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12]

2008-08-11 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Elbert Pol on 8/11/2008 9:08 AM: Thanks for your updated reports. It looks like libsigsegv won't help you unless you find someone willing to port it to your platform. | | Are you in a position to help debug this? The simplest test

Re: os/2 c-stack [was: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12]

2008-08-11 Thread Elbert Pol
Hello Bruno, Ok, thankz for you're answer. Bruno Haible wrote: Hi Elbert, i386-pc-os2-emx | no | no | 2.5 This line simply means that libsigsegv has no support for EMX. This is only going to change if someone familiar with the EMX API and with a debugger on that platform is doing the

gethostname

2008-08-11 Thread Sam Steingold
gnulib/lib/gethostname.c says: #ifdef HAVE_UNAME # include sys/utsname.h #endif 1. why aren't you testing for HAVE_SYS_UTSNAME_H instead? 2. are there really systems without uname sys/utsname.h, given that these are in posix? http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/uname.html

Re: os/2 c-stack [was: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12]

2008-08-11 Thread Elbert Pol
Hi, Sorry forgot that to test :( Eric Blake wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Elbert Pol on 8/11/2008 9:08 AM: Thanks for your updated reports. It looks like libsigsegv won't help you unless you find someone willing to port it to your platform. | | Are you in

Re: gethostname

2008-08-11 Thread Simon Josefsson
Sam Steingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: gnulib/lib/gethostname.c says: #ifdef HAVE_UNAME # include sys/utsname.h #endif 1. why aren't you testing for HAVE_SYS_UTSNAME_H instead? 2. are there really systems without uname sys/utsname.h, given that these are in posix?

Re: gethostname

2008-08-11 Thread Sam Steingold
* Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-11 23:23:24 +0200]: Sam Steingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: gnulib/lib/gethostname.c says: #ifdef HAVE_UNAME # include sys/utsname.h #endif 1. why aren't you testing for HAVE_SYS_UTSNAME_H instead? 2. are there really systems without uname

Re: diversion failure [was: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12]

2008-08-11 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [re-adding gnulib] According to Alain Guibert on 8/11/2008 3:16 PM: | Hello Eric, thanks for your support, | | On Monday, August 11, 2008 at 7:00:34 -0600, Eric Blake wrote: | | platforms where fopen(file,a+) opened at the end instead of the |

Re: os/2 c-stack [was: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12]

2008-08-11 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Elbert Pol on 8/11/2008 1:51 PM: | Thanks for your updated reports. It looks like libsigsegv won't help you | unless you find someone willing to port it to your platform. Actually, according to your logs, libsigsegv did make a