Hello,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 02:06:55AM CEST:
+uninstall-hook: uninstall-relocwrapper
+uninstall-relocwrapper:
+if RELOCATABLE_VIA_LD
+ @:
+else
+ if test $(RELOCATABLE) = yes; then \
+ case '$(EXEEXT)' in \
+ .bin*) ;; \
+ *)
() Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org
() Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:57:00 +0200
For me, it's a bit different: I don't think the number of modules
has a lot of information.
Perhaps it's just my (personal) gnulib-newbie fear...
There are some modules, like 'stdint', which provide hardly any code,
Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org writes:
+uninstall-hook: uninstall-relocwrapper
+uninstall-relocwrapper:
+if RELOCATABLE_VIA_LD
+@:
+else
+if test $(RELOCATABLE) = yes; then \
+case '$(EXEEXT)' in \
+.bin*) ;; \
+*) $(MAKE) uninstall
[adding bug-autoconf]
On 06/13/2010 05:43 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Hi Ben,
The problem is that AC_FUNC_STRTOD assumes that strtod does not
exist when cross-compiling, which in turn makes the strtod module
assume that it does not need to handle an existing declaration.
Ah, so
On 06/14/2010 12:01 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com writes:
Or even better, why not push those two tests upstream into autoconf,
then have gnulib override AC_FUNC_STRTOD if it detects older autoconf,
so that everyone using upstream AC_FUNC_STRTOD can reliably detect these
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com writes:
Or even better, why not push those two tests upstream into autoconf,
then have gnulib override AC_FUNC_STRTOD if it detects older autoconf,
so that everyone using upstream AC_FUNC_STRTOD can reliably detect these
same bugs?
The strtod() tests that are
Hi Ben,
* Ben Pfaff wrote on Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 06:36:17PM CEST:
Here is another approach that I had not thought of before.
What if we added the following to
modules/relocatable-prog-wrapper:
*) cd $(top_builddir) \
$(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) EXEEXT=.bin$(EXEEXT) \
Jan Andersen wrote on bug-tar:
I am trying to build tar from source on AIX 5L, but it fails with:
CC priv-set.o
In file included from priv-set.c:23:
priv-set.h:24:19: error: priv.h: A file or directory in the path name does
not exist.
...
I have tried to #undef HAVE_PRIV_H in
Hi Eric,
With two old old old tests and no reasonable cross-compiling behaviour I
would say that the best thing to do is to move these two blocks of C
code
into gl_FUNC_STRTOD's test, and stop using AC_FUNC_STRTOD. Then the
autoconf documentation can mark this macro
Progress report from the energetic (ha!) curmudgeon
I have
- upgraded my computer from Etch to Lenny;
- installed the requisite support packages, except for libtool (libltdl)
and libunistring, which are installed under prefix /home/ttn/local;
- done a git pull earlier today;
- successfully
On 06/14/2010 01:56 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Or even better, why not push those two tests upstream into autoconf,
then have gnulib override AC_FUNC_STRTOD if it detects older autoconf,
so that everyone using upstream AC_FUNC_STRTOD can reliably detect these
same bugs?
I don't think this
On 06/14/2010 02:25 PM, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
BTW, gnulib folks: Here is a suitable ChangeLog entry:
2010-06-14 Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org (tiny change)
git-version-gen: Init shell var to avoid env var influence.
* build-aux/git-version-gen (v): Init shell var to
() Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com
() Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:37:07 -0600
Since gnulib still maintains ChangeLog in the repository (you _are_
using the git-merge-changelog program, right?), it is appropriate to
include ChangeLog edits as part of your git commit.
OK, thanks for the reminder
Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org writes:
1) to apply the patch below,
2) to use the common idiom
if test $HAVE_STRTOD = 0 || test $REPLACE_STRTOD = 1; then
like you did above,
3) to improve the cross-compiling guess.
Here is #3:
From 60471b91b5dbdf2c24c258640cee6dfdb32c4d6f
Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org writes:
So, I would propose
1) to apply the patch below,
2) to use the common idiom
if test $HAVE_STRTOD = 0 || test $REPLACE_STRTOD = 1; then
like you did above,
3) to improve the cross-compiling guess.
Good ideas. Here is #2. I'll follow
Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org writes:
At this point, it would be a good idea to mark all AC_FUNC_* macros that
request an AC_LIBOBJ replacement as obsolete and refer the user to Gnulib
for both the macro and the workaround code (and the documentation).
Except maybe AC_FUNC_MALLOC and
Hi,
There's an error on the select() function:
int
rpl_select (int nfds, fd_set *rfds, fd_set *wfds, fd_set *xfds,
struct timeval *timeout)
{
static struct timeval tv0;
static HANDLE hEvent;
HANDLE h, handle_array[FD_SETSIZE + 2];
fd_set handle_rfds, handle_wfds, handle_xfds;
17 matches
Mail list logo
