Re: gnulib update (Tue Sep 13 09:03:01 EDT 2005)

2005-09-13 Thread Derek Price
Jim, all, Is there a GNULIB standard for this yet? Paul Eggert just went through my glob_.h and tweaked the cpp spacing in the other direction. I assumed at the time this meant that double-include protection should be ignored for the purposes of indenting compiler directives in headers, but Jim

Re: gnulib update (Tue Sep 13 09:03:01 EDT 2005)

2005-09-13 Thread Jim Meyering
Derek Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim, all, Is there a GNULIB standard for this yet? Paul Eggert just went through my glob_.h and tweaked the cpp spacing in the other direction. I assumed at the time this meant that double-include protection should be ignored for the purposes of

Re: gnulib update (Tue Sep 13 09:03:01 EDT 2005)

2005-09-13 Thread Derek Price
Jim Meyering wrote: Personally, I've found it useful enough to have consistently cpp-indented I like it too, but I was willing to go with the flow on GNULIB. :) sources that I wrote cppi, and to use it in a commit-hook for the coreutils. I don't know when it became an option, but

Re: gnulib update (Tue Sep 13 09:03:01 EDT 2005)

2005-09-13 Thread Jim Meyering
Derek Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim Meyering wrote: Personally, I've found it useful enough to have consistently cpp-indented I like it too, but I was willing to go with the flow on GNULIB. :) sources that I wrote cppi, and to use it in a commit-hook for the coreutils. I don't know