Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-07-22 Thread Bruno Haible
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: Bruno all-local $(libfoo_la_OBJECTS): $(ARGZ_H) Hmmm, why do you need this since $(ARGZ_H) is already in $(BUILT_SOURCES), and all depends on $(BUILT_SOURCES)? You are right, the presence of $(ARGZ_H) in $(BUILT_SOURCES) makes this rule unnecessary. (Historically,

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-07-19 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Bruno == Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Bruno all-local $(libfoo_la_OBJECTS): $(ARGZ_H) Hmmm, why do you need this since $(ARGZ_H) is already in $(BUILT_SOURCES), and all depends on $(BUILT_SOURCES)? -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz ___

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-07-11 Thread Bruno Haible
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: It's a bit tricky to reproduce: You need a system which has no argz.h, then configure, then `make check' without prior make. If you had ever run `make' before in this build tree, even after `make clean' the dependency information is stored in libltdl/.deps/*.Plo, and

Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-06-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ this thread starts at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-06/msg00169.html ] Hi Sven, others, * Sven Verdoolaege wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 09:11:36AM CEST: On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:31:48AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: It's this version that fails on solaris. Let's